GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Farthest Frontier vs HUMANKIND

Farthest Frontier is a simulation strategy game from Crate Entertainment (2025) while HUMANKIND is an open-world simulation game from AMPLITUDE Studios (2021).

Farthest Frontier

2025 · Crate Entertainment

7.7GamingPickz Score

$34.99

Steam: Very Positive

HUMANKIND

2021 · AMPLITUDE Studios

6.4GamingPickz Score

$4.99

Steam: Mixed

What each one is

Steam files Farthest Frontier under Simulation and Strategy. In contrast, it files HUMANKIND under Open-World and Simulation.

Farthest Frontier

Protect and guide your people as you forge a town from untamed wilderness at the edge of the known world. Harvest raw materials, hunt, fish and farm to survive. Produce crafted items to trade, consume, equip and fight with as you battle for your survival against the elements and outside threats.

Description from its Steam store page

HUMANKIND

Rewrite history by shaping a civilization as unique as you are. Combine 60 cultures from the Ancient Era to the Modern Age to lead your empire to victory. Build thriving cities, outsmart rivals in epic battles, spread your influence and leave your mark on HUMANKIND™.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Farthest FrontierHUMANKIND
GamingPickz Score7.7/106.4/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (86%, 25,411)Mixed (69%, 28,708)
Critic aggregate83/100No aggregate
Price$34.99$4.99
Install size11 GB25 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20252021
DeveloperCrate EntertainmentAMPLITUDE Studios

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Farthest Frontier vs HUMANKIND, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Farthest FrontierSimulation strategy game
    HUMANKINDOpen-world simulation game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Farthest FrontierEarly Access, Historical, Agriculture
    HUMANKINDStrategy, Turn-Based Strategy, 4X

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Farthest FrontierScore 7.7 · 86% on Steam · 83 critic
    HUMANKINDScore 6.4 · 69% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Farthest Frontier25,411 reviews · 1 add-on · 11 GB
    HUMANKIND28,708 reviews · 15 add-ons · 25 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Farthest Frontier$34.99
    HUMANKIND$4.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Farthest FrontierPlayable
    HUMANKINDPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Farthest Frontier and HUMANKIND on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Farthest Frontier (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
  • The cheaper right now: HUMANKIND ($4.99)
  • Lighter on storage: Farthest Frontier (11 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Historical4XCity BuilderStrategyManagementBuildingSimulationSurvival

Where they differ

Farthest Frontier is also

Early AccessAgricultureMedievalImmersive SimResource ManagementTop-Down

HUMANKIND is also

Turn-Based StrategyMultiplayerGrand StrategySingleplayerTurn-BasedHex Grid

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Farthest Frontier is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. HUMANKIND is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Farthest Frontier and 0 for HUMANKIND. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Farthest Frontier and HUMANKIND in scope?

Farthest Frontier has drawn 25,411 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 11 GB. HUMANKIND has drawn 28,708 Steam reviews, ships 15 add-ons and installs in 25 GB.

Is Farthest Frontier or HUMANKIND better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Farthest Frontier rates higher (7.7 to 6.4). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Farthest Frontier or HUMANKIND?

HUMANKIND is cheaper right now at $4.99, against $34.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each