GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Feed and Grow: Fish vs Stranded Deep

Feed and Grow: Fish is an open-world sandbox game from Old B1ood (2016) while Stranded Deep is an open-world sandbox game from Beam Team Games (2022).

Feed and Grow: Fish

2016 · Old B1ood

6.9GamingPickz Score

$14.99

Steam: Mostly Positive

Stranded Deep

2022 · Beam Team Games

6.8GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Mostly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Feed and Grow: Fish under Open-World and Sandbox. In contrast, it files Stranded Deep under Open-World and Sandbox.

Feed and Grow: Fish

Hunt and eat other fish - simply, grow into larger beasts!

Description from its Steam store page

Stranded Deep

Take the role of a plane crash survivor stranded somewhere in the Pacific Ocean. Come face to face with some of the most life threatening scenarios that will result in a different experience each time you play. Scavenge. Discover. Survive.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Feed and Grow: FishStranded Deep
GamingPickz Score6.9/106.8/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (78%, 21,657)Mostly Positive (74%, 47,793)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$14.99$19.99
Install size2 GB4 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20162022
DeveloperOld B1oodBeam Team Games

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Feed and Grow: Fish vs Stranded Deep, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Feed and Grow: FishOpen-world sandbox game
    Stranded DeepOpen-world sandbox game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Feed and Grow: FishSimulation, Underwater, Survival
    Stranded DeepOpen World Survival Craft, Survival, Open World

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Feed and Grow: FishScore 6.9 · 78% on Steam
    Stranded DeepScore 6.8 · 74% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Feed and Grow: Fish21,657 reviews · 2 GB
    Stranded Deep47,793 reviews · 1 add-on · 4 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Feed and Grow: Fish$14.99
    Stranded Deep$19.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Feed and Grow: FishPlayable
    Stranded DeepPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Feed and Grow: Fish takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Feed and Grow: Fish and Stranded Deep on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Feed and Grow: Fish (GamingPickz Score 6.9)
  • The cheaper right now: Feed and Grow: Fish ($14.99)
  • Lighter on storage: Feed and Grow: Fish (2 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Stranded Deep (47,793 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SimulationUnderwaterSurvivalMultiplayerEarly AccessActionOpen WorldIndie

Where they differ

Feed and Grow: Fish is also

ColorfulFunnyFishingCuteGreat Soundtrack

Stranded Deep is also

Open World Survival CraftCraftingFirst-PersonExplorationBuilding

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Feed and Grow: Fish is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Stranded Deep is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Feed and Grow: FishStranded Deep
Minimum GPUDirect3D 11.0 mimimum with atleast 2GB2GB
Minimum CPUX64 Quad Core CPU 2.0GHz+
Minimum RAM4 GB8 GB
Install size2 GB4 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Feed and Grow: Fish · Stranded Deep.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Feed and Grow: Fish and 1 for Stranded Deep. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Close to Stranded Deep

Common questions

How different are Feed and Grow: Fish and Stranded Deep in scope?

Feed and Grow: Fish has drawn 21,657 Steam reviews and installs in 2 GB. Stranded Deep has drawn 47,793 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 4 GB.

Is Feed and Grow: Fish or Stranded Deep better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Feed and Grow: Fish rates higher (6.9 to 6.8). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Feed and Grow: Fish or Stranded Deep?

Feed and Grow: Fish is cheaper right now at $14.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each