GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Five Nights at Freddy's vs Town of Salem

Five Nights at Freddy's is a horror survival game from Scott Cawthon (2014) while Town of Salem is an RPG strategy game from BlankMediaGames (2014).

Quick answer: Five Nights at Freddy's rates higher, 8.0 to 7.7 on the GamingPickz Score.

Five Nights at Freddy's

2014 · Scott Cawthon

8.0GamingPickz Score

$4.99

Steam: Very Positive

Town of Salem

2014 · BlankMediaGames

7.7GamingPickz Score

$4.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Five Nights at Freddy's is filed under Horror and Survival. In contrast, Town of Salem under RPG and Strategy.

Five Nights at Freddy's

Welcome to your new summer job at Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, where kids and parents alike come for entertainment and food! The main attraction is Freddy Fazbear, of course; and his two friends. They are animatronic robots, programmed to please the crowds!

Description from its Steam store page

Town of Salem

Inspired by the party games Werewolf and Mafia, Town of Salem is a game of murder, mystery and deception.

Description from its Steam store page

Story, characters and reception

Five Nights at Freddy's
Reception

Video game series The Five Nights at Freddy's video game series has had a mixed reception. The original game received "generally favorable" reviews, earning a score of 78 on the review aggregator website Metacritic . Omri Petitte of PC Gamer described it as a "less-is-more" experience, where fear stemmed more from anticipation than direct threats. (Wikipedia)

Town of Salem
Reception

In 2020, PC Gamer named Town of Salem one of the best free-to-play browser games. They described it as difficult to explain, but easy to get the hang of. Matt Cox of Rock, Paper, Shotgun described the game as "an online hidden role game with no friends or eyeballs, and a whole load of bullshit. (Wikipedia)

At a glance

Five Nights at Freddy'sTown of Salem
GamingPickz Score8.0/107.7/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (94%, 59,195)Very Positive (88%, 36,262)
Critic aggregate78/100No aggregate
Price$4.99$4.99
Install size0.24 GB3 GB
Steam Deckverifiedplayable
Released20142014
DeveloperScott CawthonBlankMediaGames

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Five Nights at Freddy's vs Town of Salem, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Five Nights at Freddy'sHorror survival game
    Town of SalemRPG strategy game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Five Nights at Freddy'sHorror, Survival Horror, Robots
    Town of SalemStrategy, Mystery, Indie

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Five Nights at Freddy'sScore 8.0 · 94% on Steam · 78 critic
    Town of SalemScore 7.7 · 88% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Five Nights at Freddy's59,195 reviews · 0.24 GB
    Town of Salem36,262 reviews · 2 add-ons · 3 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Five Nights at Freddy's$4.99
    Town of Salem$4.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Five Nights at Freddy'sVerified
    Town of SalemPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Five Nights at Freddy's takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Five Nights at Freddy's and Town of Salem on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityFive Nights at Freddy's

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Mobile
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Five Nights at Freddy's (GamingPickz Score 8.0)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Five Nights at Freddy's (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: Five Nights at Freddy's (0.24 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

IndieSurvival

Where they differ

Five Nights at Freddy's is also

HorrorSingleplayerSurvival HorrorRobotsPsychological HorrorDifficult

Town of Salem is also

MultiplayerStrategyMysterySocial DeductionRPGCasual

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Five Nights at Freddy's is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Town of Salem is relaxed, easy to pick up.

System requirements, side by side

Five Nights at Freddy'sTown of Salem
Minimum GPU
Minimum CPU2 Ghz
Minimum RAM2 GB
Install size0.24 GB3 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Five Nights at Freddy's · Town of Salem.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Five Nights at Freddy's and 0 for Town of Salem. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Five Nights at Freddy's and Town of Salem in scope?

Five Nights at Freddy's has drawn 59,195 Steam reviews and installs in 0.24 GB. Town of Salem has drawn 36,262 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 3 GB.

Is Five Nights at Freddy's or Town of Salem better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Five Nights at Freddy's rates higher (8.0 to 7.7). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Five Nights at Freddy's or Town of Salem?

Five Nights at Freddy's is cheaper right now at $4.99, against $4.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Should I get Five Nights at Freddy's or Town of Salem?

Five Nights at Freddy's rates higher, 8.0 to 7.7 on the GamingPickz Score. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each