For The King vs Talisman: Digital Classic Edition
For The King is an open-world roguelike game from IronOak Games (2018) while Talisman: Digital Classic Edition is an RPG strategy game from Nomad Games (2014).
What each one is
Steam files For The King under Open-World and Roguelike. In contrast, it files Talisman: Digital Classic Edition under RPG and Strategy.
For The King is a strategic RPG that blends tabletop and roguelike elements in a challenging adventure that spans the realms. Set off on a single player experience or play cooperatively both online and locally.
The complete 4th Edition experience of the classic fantasy adventure board game, Talisman. On your travels, you will need strength, courage and some good dice rolls to survive the dangers you face and beat your opponents to the centre of the board!
At a glance
| For The King | Talisman: Digital Classic Edition | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.8/10 | 6.7/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (88%, 43,739) | Mostly Positive (78%, 10,010) |
| Critic aggregate | 79/100 | No aggregate |
| Price | $19.99 | $6.99 |
| Install size | 3 GB | 0.59 GB |
| Steam Deck | playable | playable |
| Released | 2018 | 2014 |
| Developer | IronOak Games | Nomad Games |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
For The King vs Talisman: Digital Classic Edition, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
For The KingOpen-world roguelike gameTalisman: Digital Classic EditionRPG strategy gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
For The KingRPG, Online Co-Op, StrategyTalisman: Digital Classic EditionBoard Game, Tabletop, StrategyThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
For The King ✓Score 7.8 · 88% on Steam · 79 criticTalisman: Digital Classic EditionScore 6.7 · 78% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
For The King43,739 reviews · 7 add-ons · 3 GBTalisman: Digital Classic Edition10,010 reviews · 49 add-ons · 0.59 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
For The King$19.99Talisman: Digital Classic Edition ✓$6.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
For The KingPlayableTalisman: Digital Classic EditionPlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueFor The King and Talisman: Digital Classic Edition on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: For The King (GamingPickz Score 7.8)
- The cheaper right now: Talisman: Digital Classic Edition ($6.99)
- Lighter on storage: Talisman: Digital Classic Edition (0.59 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: For The King (43,739 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
RPGStrategyTurn-BasedMultiplayerTabletopAdventureTurn-Based StrategyBoard Game
Where they differ
Online Co-OpRogue-likeOpen WorldTurn-Based CombatCo-opRogue-lite
Card GameLocal MultiplayerSingleplayerGames WorkshopCasualTouch-Friendly
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, For The King is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Talisman: Digital Classic Edition is relaxed, easy to pick up.
System requirements, side by side
| For The King | Talisman: Digital Classic Edition | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | GeForce 8800 GTX (768 MB) / Intel HD 4600 / Radeon HD 3850 (512 MB) | — |
| Minimum CPU | Intel Core2 Duo E4300 (2 * 1800) / AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450e (2 * 2300) | — |
| Minimum RAM | 4 GB | — |
| Install size | 3 GB | 0.59 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: For The King · Talisman: Digital Classic Edition.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 5 accessibility features for For The King and 1 for Talisman: Digital Classic Edition. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are For The King and Talisman: Digital Classic Edition in scope?
For The King has drawn 43,739 Steam reviews, ships 7 add-ons and installs in 3 GB. Talisman: Digital Classic Edition has drawn 10,010 Steam reviews, ships 49 add-ons and installs in 0.59 GB.
Is For The King or Talisman: Digital Classic Edition better?
By the GamingPickz Score, For The King rates higher (7.8 to 6.7). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, For The King or Talisman: Digital Classic Edition?
Talisman: Digital Classic Edition is cheaper right now at $6.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.