GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

GOD EATER 3 vs NieR: Automata

GOD EATER 3 is an action-RPG JRPG game from BANDAI NAMCO Studios Inc. (2019) while NieR: Automata is an action-RPG JRPG game (2017).

GOD EATER 3

2019 · BANDAI NAMCO Studios Inc.

6.8GamingPickz Score

$59.99

Steam: Mostly Positive

NieR: Automata

2017 · Studio not listed

7.8GamingPickz Score

$39.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files GOD EATER 3 under Action-RPG and JRPG. In contrast, it files NieR: Automata under Action-RPG and JRPG.

GOD EATER 3

Set in a post-apocalyptic setting, it’s up to your special team of God Eaters to take down god-like monsters devastating the world. With an epic story, unique characters, and all new God Arcs and Aragami, the latest evolution in ACTION is here!

Description from its Steam store page

NieR: Automata

NieR: Automata tells the story of androids 2B, 9S and A2 and their battle to reclaim the machine-driven dystopia overrun by powerful machines.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

GOD EATER 3NieR: Automata
GamingPickz Score6.8/107.8/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (79%, 9,948)Very Positive (87%, 153,070)
Critic aggregate71/10084/100
Price$59.99$39.99
Install size25 GB50 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20192017
DeveloperBANDAI NAMCO Studios Inc.

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

GOD EATER 3 vs NieR: Automata, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    GOD EATER 3Action-RPG JRPG game
    NieR: AutomataAction-RPG JRPG game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    GOD EATER 3Anime, Action, Character Customization
    NieR: AutomataStory Rich, Female Protagonist, Hack and Slash

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    GOD EATER 3Score 6.8 · 79% on Steam · 71 critic
    NieR: AutomataScore 7.8 · 87% on Steam · 84 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    GOD EATER 39,948 reviews · 25 GB
    NieR: Automata153,070 reviews · 8 add-ons · 50 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    GOD EATER 3$59.99
    NieR: Automata$39.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    GOD EATER 3Playable
    NieR: AutomataPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

NieR: Automata takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

GOD EATER 3 and NieR: Automata on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: NieR: Automata (GamingPickz Score 7.8)
  • The cheaper right now: NieR: Automata ($39.99)
  • Lighter on storage: GOD EATER 3 (25 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: NieR: Automata (153,070 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

AnimeActionHack and SlashJRPGRPGSingleplayerPost-apocalypticGreat Soundtrack

Where they differ

GOD EATER 3 is also

Character CustomizationHuntingMultiplayerCo-opOnline Co-OpAction RPG

NieR: Automata is also

RobotsAtmosphericSci-fiNuditySpectacle fighterBullet Hell

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, GOD EATER 3 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. NieR: Automata is demanding, for players who want a challenge.

System requirements, side by side

GOD EATER 3NieR: Automata
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Minimum CPUIntel Core i3 2100
Minimum RAM4 GB
Install size25 GB50 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: GOD EATER 3 · NieR: Automata.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for GOD EATER 3 and 5 for NieR: Automata. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are GOD EATER 3 and NieR: Automata in scope?

GOD EATER 3 has drawn 9,948 Steam reviews and installs in 25 GB. NieR: Automata has drawn 153,070 Steam reviews, ships 8 add-ons and installs in 50 GB.

Is GOD EATER 3 or NieR: Automata better?

By the GamingPickz Score, NieR: Automata rates higher (7.8 to 6.8). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, GOD EATER 3 or NieR: Automata?

NieR: Automata is cheaper right now at $39.99, against $59.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each