GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit vs Hollow Knight

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit is a platformer game from Arkedo (2012) while Hollow Knight is an open-world platformer game from Team Cherry (2017).

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit

2012 · Arkedo

6.8GamingPickz Score

$14.99

Steam: Very Positive

Hollow Knight

2017 · Team Cherry

8.9GamingPickz Score

$14.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit under Platformer. In contrast, it files Hollow Knight under Open-World and Platformer.

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit

A crazy action-adventure platformer... In Hell.

Description from its Steam store page

Hollow Knight

Forge your own path in Hollow Knight! An epic action adventure through a vast ruined kingdom of insects and heroes. Explore twisting caverns, battle tainted creatures and befriend bizarre bugs, all in a classic, hand-drawn 2D style.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead RabbitHollow Knight
GamingPickz Score6.8/108.9/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (85%, 3,724)Overwhelmingly Positive (97%, 559,290)
Critic aggregate64/10087/100
Price$14.99$14.99
Install size9 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedverified
Released20122017
DeveloperArkedoTeam Cherry

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit vs Hollow Knight, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead RabbitPlatformer game
    Hollow KnightOpen-world platformer game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead RabbitPlatformer, Action, 2D
    Hollow KnightMetroidvania, Souls-like, Platformer

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead RabbitScore 6.8 · 85% on Steam · 64 critic
    Hollow KnightScore 8.9 · 97% on Steam · 87 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit3,724 reviews · 2 add-ons
    Hollow Knight559,290 reviews · 2 add-ons · 9 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit$14.99
    Hollow Knight$14.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead RabbitUnsupported
    Hollow KnightVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Hollow Knight takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit and Hollow Knight on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Hollow Knight (GamingPickz Score 8.9)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Hollow Knight (verified)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Hollow Knight (559,290 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

PlatformerAction2DSingleplayerMetroidvaniaAdventureGreat SoundtrackSide Scroller

Where they differ

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit is also

ComedyFunnyGoreViolentCartoonyDark Humor

Hollow Knight is also

Souls-likeAtmosphericExplorationStory RichHand-drawnMultiple Endings

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Hollow Knight is demanding, for players who want a challenge.

System requirements, side by side

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead RabbitHollow Knight
Minimum GPUGeForce GTX 560 Ti (1GB)
Minimum CPUIntel Core i3-3240, AMD FX-4300
Minimum RAM4 GB
Install size9 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit · Hollow Knight.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit and 1 for Hollow Knight. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit and Hollow Knight in scope?

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit has drawn 3,724 Steam reviews and ships 2 add-ons. Hollow Knight has drawn 559,290 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 9 GB.

Is Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit or Hollow Knight better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Hollow Knight rates higher (8.9 to 6.8). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit or Hollow Knight?

Hell Yeah! Wrath of the Dead Rabbit is cheaper right now at $14.99, against $14.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each