GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Hurtworld vs The Forest

Hurtworld is an FPS open-world game from Bankroll Studios (2019) while The Forest is a horror open-world game from Endnight Games (2018).

Hurtworld

2019 · Bankroll Studios

6.8GamingPickz Score

$24.99

Steam: Mostly Positive

The Forest

2018 · Endnight Games

8.3GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Hurtworld under FPS and Open-World. In contrast, it files The Forest under Horror and Open-World.

Hurtworld

Hurtworld is a hardcore multiplayer survival FPS with a focus on competitive gunplay and strategic map control. Built for hardcore gamers, Hurtworld aims to punish.

Description from its Steam store page

The Forest

As the lone survivor of a passenger jet crash, you find yourself in a mysterious forest battling to stay alive against a society of cannibalistic mutants. Build, explore, survive in this terrifying first person survival horror simulator.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

HurtworldThe Forest
GamingPickz Score6.8/108.3/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (76%, 30,966)Overwhelmingly Positive (96%, 680,814)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate83/100
Price$24.99$19.99
Install size2 GB5 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedplayable
Released20192018
DeveloperBankroll StudiosEndnight Games

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Hurtworld vs The Forest, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    HurtworldFPS open-world game
    The ForestHorror open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    HurtworldSurvival, FPS, Open World
    The ForestOpen World Survival Craft, Survival, Open World

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    HurtworldScore 6.8 · 76% on Steam
    The ForestScore 8.3 · 96% on Steam · 83 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Hurtworld30,966 reviews · 2 GB
    The Forest680,814 reviews · 5 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Hurtworld$24.99
    The Forest$19.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    HurtworldUnsupported
    The ForestPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

The Forest takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Hurtworld and The Forest on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: The Forest (GamingPickz Score 8.3)
  • The cheaper right now: The Forest ($19.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: The Forest (playable)
  • Lighter on storage: Hurtworld (2 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: The Forest (680,814 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SurvivalOpen WorldOpen World Survival CraftCraftingBuildingSandboxAdventureAction

Where they differ

Hurtworld is also

FPSMultiplayerPvPCo-opShooterThird Person

The Forest is also

HorrorSurvival HorrorExplorationAtmosphericGoreRealistic

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Hurtworld is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. The Forest is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

HurtworldThe Forest
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce 8800GT
Minimum CPUIntel Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
Minimum RAM4 GB
Install size2 GB5 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Hurtworld · The Forest.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Hurtworld and 1 for The Forest. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Hurtworld and The Forest in scope?

Hurtworld has drawn 30,966 Steam reviews and installs in 2 GB. The Forest has drawn 680,814 Steam reviews and installs in 5 GB.

Is Hurtworld or The Forest better?

By the GamingPickz Score, The Forest rates higher (8.3 to 6.8). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Hurtworld or The Forest?

The Forest is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $24.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each