Last Man Standing vs Radical Heights
Last Man Standing is an FPS mmorpg game from Free Reign Entertainment (2017) while Radical Heights is an FPS mmorpg game from Boss Key Productions (2018).
What each one is
Steam files Last Man Standing under FPS and Mmorpg. In contrast, it files Radical Heights under FPS and Mmorpg.
The Ultimate BATTLE ROYALE! Sharpen your skills and kill everyone in your way as you hunt for guns, gear and glory in a massive battlefield where only ONE can be crowned the LAST MAN STANDING. Earn cash prizes in a monthly competitions,
Welcome to RADICAL HEIGHTS, a free X-TREME Early Access BATTLE ROYALE shooter. Partake in high-stakes gunplay as you loot for weapons, gadgets, cosmetics, and CASH! Survive to the end or risk it all in this irreverent action game show where everyone wants to be rich and famous!
At a glance
| Last Man Standing | Radical Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 5.8/10 | 5.7/10 |
| Steam rating | Mixed (61%, 17,338) | Mixed (62%, 9,713) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | No aggregate |
| Price | Not listed | Not listed |
| Install size | 10 GB | 6 GB |
| Steam Deck | Untested | Untested |
| Released | 2017 | 2018 |
| Developer | Free Reign Entertainment | Boss Key Productions |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Last Man Standing vs Radical Heights, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Last Man StandingFPS mmorpg gameRadical HeightsFPS mmorpg gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Last Man StandingFree to Play, Survival, Open WorldRadical HeightsBattle Royale, Free to Play, ActionThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Last Man Standing ✓Score 5.8 · 61% on SteamRadical HeightsScore 5.7 · 62% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Last Man Standing17,338 reviews · 10 GBRadical Heights9,713 reviews · 6 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Last Man StandingNot listedRadical HeightsNot listedRead live from Steam and subject to change.
Last Man Standing takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueLast Man Standing and Radical Heights on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- Lighter on storage: Radical Heights (6 GB)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Free to PlaySurvivalMultiplayerOpen WorldShooterActionMassively MultiplayerBattle Royale
Where they differ
First-PersonStrategyViolentThird PersonSingleplayerZombies
Early Access1980sCharacter CustomizationMemesAnimeBMX
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Last Man Standing is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Radical Heights is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Last Man Standing | Radical Heights | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | NVIDIA GTX 460 2 GB | Nvidia GTX 660 2GB |
| Minimum CPU | Intel Core i5-2400 | Intel Core i5-2500K / FX-6300 |
| Minimum RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Install size | 10 GB | 6 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Last Man Standing · Radical Heights.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Last Man Standing and 0 for Radical Heights. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Last Man Standing and Radical Heights in scope?
Last Man Standing has drawn 17,338 Steam reviews and installs in 10 GB. Radical Heights has drawn 9,713 Steam reviews and installs in 6 GB.
Is Last Man Standing or Radical Heights better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Last Man Standing rates higher (5.8 to 5.7). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Last Man Standing or Radical Heights?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.