GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Loadout vs MADNESS: Project Nexus

Loadout is a free to play game from Edge of Reality (2014) while MADNESS: Project Nexus is a gore game from GIBBING TREE, LLC (2021).

Loadout

2014 · Edge of Reality

7.5GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Very Positive

MADNESS: Project Nexus

2021 · GIBBING TREE, LLC

8.1GamingPickz Score

$24.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Loadout under Free To Play and Third-Person Shooter. In contrast, it files MADNESS: Project Nexus under Gore and Beat 'Em Up.

Loadout

Loadout is an outrageous new multi-player shooter that’s all about the guns, baby! Build a massive variety of absolutely insane weaponry - billions of combinations - totally customized, totally unique, and totally deadly.

Description from its Steam store page

MADNESS: Project Nexus

MADNESS: Project Nexus is a third-person Run n' Gun / Beat'Em Up filled with arcade-style action and button-mashing brutality. Gun your way through droves of bad guys in the Story Campaign, or build your perfect killing machine in the neverending onslaught of Arena Mode.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

LoadoutMADNESS: Project Nexus
GamingPickz Score7.5/108.1/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (87%, 39,078)Overwhelmingly Positive (97%, 17,530)
Critic aggregate72/100No aggregate
PriceNot listed$24.99
Install size1 GB
Steam DeckUntestedplayable
Released20142021
DeveloperEdge of RealityGIBBING TREE, LLC

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Loadout vs MADNESS: Project Nexus, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    LoadoutFree to play game
    MADNESS: Project NexusGore game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    LoadoutFree to Play, Third-Person Shooter, Action
    MADNESS: Project NexusGore, Beat 'em up, Hack and Slash

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    LoadoutScore 7.5 · 87% on Steam · 72 critic
    MADNESS: Project NexusScore 8.1 · 97% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Loadout39,078 reviews · 5 add-ons
    MADNESS: Project Nexus17,530 reviews · 1 add-on · 1 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    LoadoutNot listed
    MADNESS: Project Nexus$24.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

MADNESS: Project Nexus takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Loadout and MADNESS: Project Nexus on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityLoadout

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: MADNESS: Project Nexus (GamingPickz Score 8.1)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Loadout (39,078 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Third-Person ShooterActionGoreGun CustomizationShooterFunnyCharacter CustomizationThird Person

Where they differ

Loadout is also

Free to PlayMultiplayerFast-PacedIndieComedyMature

MADNESS: Project Nexus is also

Beat 'em upHack and SlashCombat3DViolentController

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Loadout is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. MADNESS: Project Nexus is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

LoadoutMADNESS: Project Nexus
Minimum GPUATI Radeon HD 4350 / NVIDIA GeForce 6800 / Intel HD 3000512MB
Minimum CPUIntel Core 2 DuoDual Core 2.0GHz
Minimum RAM2 GB4 GB
Install size1 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Loadout · MADNESS: Project Nexus.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Loadout and 0 for MADNESS: Project Nexus. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Loadout and MADNESS: Project Nexus in scope?

Loadout has drawn 39,078 Steam reviews and ships 5 add-ons. MADNESS: Project Nexus has drawn 17,530 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 1 GB.

Is Loadout or MADNESS: Project Nexus better?

By the GamingPickz Score, MADNESS: Project Nexus rates higher (8.1 to 7.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Loadout or MADNESS: Project Nexus?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each