GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Mafia II (Classic) vs Saints Row: The Third

Mafia II (Classic) is an open-world racing game from 2K Czech (2011) while Saints Row: The Third is an action-adventure open-world game (2011).

Quick answer: Saints Row: The Third has the higher Metacritic, 84 to 77.

Mafia II (Classic)

2011 · 2K Czech

8.1GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Very Positive

Saints Row: The Third

2011 · Studio not listed

8.1GamingPickz Score

$2.49

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Mafia II (Classic) is filed under Open-World and Racing. In contrast, Saints Row: The Third under Action-Adventure and Open-World.

Mafia II (Classic)

Vito Scaletta has started to make a name for himself on the streets of Empire Bay as someone who can be trusted to get a job done. Together with his buddy Joe, he is working to prove himself to the Mafia, quickly escalating up the family ladder with crimes of larger reward, status and consequence… the life as a wise guy isn’t quite as...

Description from its Steam store page

Saints Row: The Third

Get ready for the most out-landish gameplay scenarios ever seen as the Third Street Saints take on the Syndicate!

Description from its Steam store page

Story, characters and reception

Mafia II (Classic)

No Wikipedia detail on file.

Saints Row: The Third
Plot

Three years after the events of Saints Row 2 , the 3rd Street Saints have merged with the Ultor Corporation to become a media and consumer empire with their own brand. While robbing a bank in Stilwater to promote an upcoming film about themselves, the Boss ( Troy Baker , Kenn Michael , Robin Atkin Downes , Laura Bailey , Tara Platt , Rebecca Sanabria or Steve Blum ) and the Saints' top lieutenants, Shaundi ( Danielle Nicolet ) and Johnny Gat ( Daniel Dae… (Wikipedia)

Reception

Saints Row: The Third reviews The game received "generally favorable" reviews, according to video game review score aggregator Metacritic . Some said the game did not try to be more than a good time, and described it as a variant of "ridiculous", "zany", or "absurd". In another way, others called it "juvenile". (Wikipedia)

At a glance

Mafia II (Classic)Saints Row: The Third
GamingPickz Score8.1/108.1/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (94%, 58,640)Overwhelmingly Positive (96%, 69,665)
Critic aggregate77/10084/100
Price$29.99$2.49
Install size8 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedplayable
Released20112011
Developer2K Czech

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Mafia II (Classic) vs Saints Row: The Third, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Mafia II (Classic)Open-world racing game
    Saints Row: The ThirdAction-adventure open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Mafia II (Classic)Action, Open World, Crime
    Saints Row: The ThirdOpen World, Action, Comedy

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Mafia II (Classic)Score 8.1 · 94% on Steam · 77 critic
    Saints Row: The ThirdScore 8.1 · 96% on Steam · 84 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Mafia II (Classic)58,640 reviews · 8 GB
    Saints Row: The Third69,665 reviews · 20 add-ons

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Mafia II (Classic)$29.99
    Saints Row: The Third$2.49

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Mafia II (Classic)Unsupported
    Saints Row: The ThirdPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Saints Row: The Third takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Mafia II (Classic) and Saints Row: The Third on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Nintendo
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The cheaper right now: Saints Row: The Third ($2.49)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Saints Row: The Third (playable)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

ActionOpen WorldCrimeSingleplayerThird PersonThird-Person ShooterShooterGreat Soundtrack

Where they differ

Mafia II (Classic) is also

Story RichAtmosphericAutomobile SimDrivingAmericaClassic

Saints Row: The Third is also

ComedyCo-opFunnyCharacter CustomizationOnline Co-OpFemale Protagonist

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Mafia II (Classic) is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Saints Row: The Third is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Mafia II (Classic)Saints Row: The Third
Minimum GPU320MB Video RAM GPU w/ Shader Model 3.0 support. NVIDIA® GeForce® 8800 series
Minimum CPU2GHz Dual Core Processor (Intel® Core 2 Duo
Minimum RAM2 GB
Install size8 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Mafia II (Classic) · Saints Row: The Third.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Mafia II (Classic) and 1 for Saints Row: The Third. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Mafia II (Classic) and Saints Row: The Third in scope?

Mafia II (Classic) has drawn 58,640 Steam reviews and installs in 8 GB. Saints Row: The Third has drawn 69,665 Steam reviews and ships 20 add-ons.

Is Mafia II (Classic) or Saints Row: The Third better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Mafia II (Classic) rates higher (8.1 to 8.1). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Mafia II (Classic) or Saints Row: The Third?

Saints Row: The Third is cheaper right now at $2.49, against $29.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Should I get Mafia II (Classic) or Saints Row: The Third?

Saints Row: The Third has the higher Metacritic, 84 to 77. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each