GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Medieval Dynasty vs Sons Of The Forest

Medieval Dynasty is an open-world RPG game from Render Cube (2021) while Sons Of The Forest is an action-adventure horror game from Endnight Games Ltd (2024).

Medieval Dynasty

2021 · Render Cube

7.8GamingPickz Score

$34.99

Steam: Very Positive

Sons Of The Forest

2024 · Endnight Games Ltd

8.2GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Medieval Dynasty under Open-World and RPG. In contrast, it files Sons Of The Forest under Action-Adventure and Horror.

Medieval Dynasty

Hunt, survive, build and lead in the harsh Middle Ages: Create your own Medieval Dynasty and ensure its long-lasting prosperity or die trying! Play alone or team up with friends to enjoy the ultimate medieval experience.

Description from its Steam store page

Sons Of The Forest

Sent to find a missing billionaire on a remote island, you find yourself in a cannibal-infested hellscape. Craft, build, and struggle to survive, alone or with friends, in this terrifying new open-world survival horror simulator.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Medieval DynastySons Of The Forest
GamingPickz Score7.8/108.2/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (90%, 52,077)Very Positive (88%, 318,107)
Critic aggregate73/100No aggregate
Price$34.99$29.99
Install size20 GB20 GB
Steam Deckplayableunsupported
Released20212024
DeveloperRender CubeEndnight Games Ltd

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Medieval Dynasty vs Sons Of The Forest, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Medieval DynastyOpen-world RPG game
    Sons Of The ForestAction-adventure horror game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Medieval DynastyCrafting, Building, Co-op
    Sons Of The ForestSurvival, Open World, Co-op

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Medieval DynastyScore 7.8 · 90% on Steam · 73 critic
    Sons Of The ForestScore 8.2 · 88% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Medieval Dynasty52,077 reviews · 9 add-ons · 20 GB
    Sons Of The Forest318,107 reviews · 20 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Medieval Dynasty$34.99
    Sons Of The Forest$29.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Medieval DynastyPlayable
    Sons Of The ForestUnsupported

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Sons Of The Forest takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Medieval Dynasty and Sons Of The Forest on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Sons Of The Forest (GamingPickz Score 8.2)
  • The cheaper right now: Sons Of The Forest ($29.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Medieval Dynasty (playable)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Sons Of The Forest (318,107 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

CraftingBuildingMultiplayerCo-opSurvivalOpen WorldImmersive SimSandbox

Where they differ

Medieval Dynasty is also

MedievalRPGRealisticHistoricalManagementAgriculture

Sons Of The Forest is also

Survival HorrorHorrorExplorationAction-AdventureActionEarly Access

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Medieval Dynasty is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Sons Of The Forest is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Medieval DynastySons Of The Forest
Minimum GPUDirectX 11 compatible GPUNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5 @ 3.3GHzINTEL CORE I5-8400
Minimum RAM8 GB12 GB
Install size20 GB20 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Medieval Dynasty · Sons Of The Forest.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 8 accessibility features for Medieval Dynasty and 1 for Sons Of The Forest. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Medieval Dynasty and Sons Of The Forest in scope?

Medieval Dynasty has drawn 52,077 Steam reviews, ships 9 add-ons and installs in 20 GB. Sons Of The Forest has drawn 318,107 Steam reviews and installs in 20 GB.

Is Medieval Dynasty or Sons Of The Forest better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Sons Of The Forest rates higher (8.2 to 7.8). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Medieval Dynasty or Sons Of The Forest?

Sons Of The Forest is cheaper right now at $29.99, against $34.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each