GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord vs Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword

Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord is an action-RPG open-world game from TaleWorlds (2020) while Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword is an action-RPG open-world game from TaleWorlds Entertainment (2011).

Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord

2020 · TaleWorlds

7.7GamingPickz Score

$49.99

Steam: Very Positive

Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword

2011 · TaleWorlds Entertainment

7.3GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord under Action-RPG and Open-World. In contrast, it files Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword under Action-RPG and Open-World.

Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord

A strategy/action RPG. Create a character, engage in diplomacy, craft, trade and conquer new lands in a vast medieval sandbox. Raise armies to lead into battle and command and fight alongside your troops in massive real-time battles using a deep but intuitive skill-based combat system.

Description from its Steam store page

Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword

The standalone expansion for Mount & Blade! With Fire & Sword builds and expands upon the highly regarded combat system from Mount & Blade: Warband. Firearms have been introduced to the battlefield.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Mount & Blade II: BannerlordMount & Blade: With Fire & Sword
GamingPickz Score7.7/107.3/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (88%, 296,754)Very Positive (88%, 14,037)
Critic aggregate77/10068/100
Price$49.99$9.99
Install size60 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20202011
DeveloperTaleWorldsTaleWorlds Entertainment

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord vs Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Mount & Blade II: BannerlordAction-RPG open-world game
    Mount & Blade: With Fire & SwordAction-RPG open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Mount & Blade II: BannerlordMedieval, Strategy, Open World
    Mount & Blade: With Fire & SwordRPG, Open World, Medieval

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Mount & Blade II: BannerlordScore 7.7 · 88% on Steam · 77 critic
    Mount & Blade: With Fire & SwordScore 7.3 · 88% on Steam · 68 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord296,754 reviews · 3 add-ons · 60 GB
    Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword14,037 reviews

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord$49.99
    Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword$9.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Mount & Blade II: BannerlordPlayable
    Mount & Blade: With Fire & SwordPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord and Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
  • The cheaper right now: Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword ($9.99)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord (296,754 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

MedievalStrategyOpen WorldRPGWarSandboxMultiplayerSingleplayer

Where they differ

Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord is also

RealisticGreat SoundtrackEarly Access

Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword is also

Action RPGBased On A NovelIndie

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Mount & Blade II: BannerlordMount & Blade: With Fire & Sword
Minimum GPUIntel® UHD Graphics 630 / NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 660 2GB / AMD Radeon™ HD 7850 2GB
Minimum CPUIntel® Core™ i3-8100 / AMD Ryzen™ 3 1200 / Snapdragon X Elite
Minimum RAM6 GB
Install size60 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord · Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord and 0 for Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Close to Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord
Close to Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword

Common questions

How different are Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord and Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword in scope?

Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord has drawn 296,754 Steam reviews, ships 3 add-ons and installs in 60 GB. Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword has drawn 14,037 Steam reviews.

Is Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord or Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord rates higher (7.7 to 7.3). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord or Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword?

Mount & Blade: With Fire & Sword is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $49.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each