No Rest for the Wicked vs Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
No Rest for the Wicked is an action-RPG open-world game from Moon Studios GmbH (2024) while Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown is an action-adventure action-RPG game (2024).
What each one is
Steam files No Rest for the Wicked under Action-RPG and Open-World. In contrast, it files Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown under Action-Adventure and Action-RPG.
From Moon Studios, the award-winning creators of Ori and the Blind Forest and Ori and the Will of the Wisps, comes No Rest for the Wicked, a unique, visceral Action RPG set in a hand-crafted world with Souls-like combat. Featuring co-op for up to four players.
Dash into a stylish and thrilling action-adventure platformer set in a mythological Persian world where the boundaries of time and space are yours to manipulate.
At a glance
| No Rest for the Wicked | Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.3/10 | 7.2/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (80%, 81,102) | Very Positive (84%, 7,043) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | 85/100 |
| Price | $39.99 | $29.99 |
| Install size | 46 GB | 30 GB |
| Steam Deck | verified | verified |
| Released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Developer | Moon Studios GmbH | — |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
No Rest for the Wicked vs Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
No Rest for the WickedAction-RPG open-world gamePrince of Persia: The Lost CrownAction-adventure action-RPG gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
No Rest for the WickedEarly Access, Open World, Souls-likePrince of Persia: The Lost CrownMetroidvania, Exploration, 2D PlatformerThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
No Rest for the Wicked ✓Score 7.3 · 80% on SteamPrince of Persia: The Lost CrownScore 7.2 · 84% on Steam · 85 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
No Rest for the Wicked81,102 reviews · 1 add-on · 46 GBPrince of Persia: The Lost Crown7,043 reviews · 4 add-ons · 30 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
No Rest for the Wicked$39.99Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown ✓$29.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
No Rest for the WickedVerifiedPrince of Persia: The Lost CrownVerifiedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueNo Rest for the Wicked and Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Multi-platform
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The cheaper right now: Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown ($29.99)
- Lighter on storage: Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown (30 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: No Rest for the Wicked (81,102 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Souls-likeAction RPGCombatExplorationHack and SlashColorfulControllerAction
Where they differ
Early AccessOpen WorldCinematicImmersive SimCharacter CustomizationRPG
Metroidvania2D PlatformerSide ScrollerPrecision PlatformerAdventureAction-Adventure
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, No Rest for the Wicked is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown is demanding, for players who want a challenge.
System requirements, side by side
| No Rest for the Wicked | Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 / AMD Radeon 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 (2GB |
| Minimum CPU | Intel Core i5-8400 / AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-4460 3.4 GHz, AMD Ryzen3 1200 3.1 GHz |
| Minimum RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Install size | 46 GB | 30 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: No Rest for the Wicked · Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for No Rest for the Wicked and 1 for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are No Rest for the Wicked and Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown in scope?
No Rest for the Wicked has drawn 81,102 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 46 GB. Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown has drawn 7,043 Steam reviews, ships 4 add-ons and installs in 30 GB.
Is No Rest for the Wicked or Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown better?
By the GamingPickz Score, No Rest for the Wicked rates higher (7.3 to 7.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, No Rest for the Wicked or Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown?
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown is cheaper right now at $29.99, against $39.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.