GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Not For Broadcast vs Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You

Not For Broadcast is a simulation game from NotGames (2022) while Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You is a simulation game from Osmotic Studios (2016).

Not For Broadcast

2022 · NotGames

7.9GamingPickz Score

$24.99

Steam: Very Positive

Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You

2016 · Osmotic Studios

7.6GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Not For Broadcast under Simulation. In contrast, it files Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You under Simulation.

Not For Broadcast

A new political Party has won a landslide in the General Election, and for some reason the editor at the news station you work at has done a runner. Now it’s up to you, the Janitor, to take over the editing booth in this tumultuous time - will you help the government, or stand in their way?

Description from its Steam store page

Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You

Big Brother has arrived - and it’s you. Investigate the lives of citizens to find those responsible for a series of terror attacks. Information from the internet, personal communications and private files are all accessible to you. But, be warned, the information you supply will have consequences.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Not For BroadcastOrwell: Keeping an Eye On You
GamingPickz Score7.9/107.6/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (94%, 12,666)Very Positive (90%, 15,565)
Critic aggregate82/10077/100
Price$24.99$9.99
Install size50 GB3 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20222016
DeveloperNotGamesOsmotic Studios

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Not For Broadcast vs Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Not For BroadcastSimulation game
    Orwell: Keeping an Eye On YouSimulation game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Not For BroadcastAdventure, 1980s, Choices Matter
    Orwell: Keeping an Eye On YouChoices Matter, Political Sim, Dystopian

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Not For BroadcastScore 7.9 · 94% on Steam · 82 critic
    Orwell: Keeping an Eye On YouScore 7.6 · 90% on Steam · 77 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Not For Broadcast12,666 reviews · 5 add-ons · 50 GB
    Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You15,565 reviews · 1 add-on · 3 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Not For Broadcast$24.99
    Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You$9.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Not For BroadcastPlayable
    Orwell: Keeping an Eye On YouPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Not For Broadcast and Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Not For Broadcast (GamingPickz Score 7.9)
  • The cheaper right now: Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You ($9.99)
  • Lighter on storage: Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You (3 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

AdventureChoices MatterDystopian SimulationStory RichInteractive FictionPolitical SimPolitical

Where they differ

Not For Broadcast is also

1980sDark ComedyFMVMultiple EndingsManagementChoose Your Own Adventure

Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You is also

DetectiveHackingPoliticsMouse onlyVisual NovelEpisodic

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Not For Broadcast is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Not For Broadcast and 0 for Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Close to Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You

Common questions

How different are Not For Broadcast and Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You in scope?

Not For Broadcast has drawn 12,666 Steam reviews, ships 5 add-ons and installs in 50 GB. Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You has drawn 15,565 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 3 GB.

Is Not For Broadcast or Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Not For Broadcast rates higher (7.9 to 7.6). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Not For Broadcast or Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You?

Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $24.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each