Oxygen Not Included vs Surviving Mars
Oxygen Not Included is an open-world sandbox game from Klei Entertainment (2019) while Surviving Mars is an open-world sandbox game from Haemimont Games (2018).
What each one is
Steam files Oxygen Not Included under Open-World and Sandbox. In contrast, it files Surviving Mars under Open-World and Sandbox.
Oxygen Not Included is a space-colony simulation game. Deep inside an alien space rock your industrious crew will need to master science, overcome strange new lifeforms, and harness incredible space tech to survive, and possibly, thrive.
There will be challenges to overcome. Execute your strategy and improve your colony’s chances of survival while unlocking the mysteries of this alien world. Are you ready? Mars is waiting for you.
At a glance
| Oxygen Not Included | Surviving Mars | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.6/10 | 7.2/10 |
| Steam rating | Overwhelmingly Positive (97%, 143,589) | Very Positive (80%, 28,730) |
| Critic aggregate | 85/100 | 76/100 |
| Price | $24.99 | Not listed |
| Install size | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Steam Deck | verified | unsupported |
| Released | 2019 | 2018 |
| Developer | Klei Entertainment | Haemimont Games |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Oxygen Not Included vs Surviving Mars, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Oxygen Not IncludedOpen-world sandbox gameSurviving MarsOpen-world sandbox gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Oxygen Not IncludedColony Sim, Base-Building, SurvivalSurviving MarsColony Sim, City Builder, StrategyThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Oxygen Not Included ✓Score 8.6 · 97% on Steam · 85 criticSurviving MarsScore 7.2 · 80% on Steam · 76 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Oxygen Not Included143,589 reviews · 7 add-ons · 3 GBSurviving Mars28,730 reviews · 6 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Oxygen Not Included$24.99Surviving MarsNot listedRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Oxygen Not Included ✓VerifiedSurviving MarsUnsupportedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Oxygen Not Included takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueOxygen Not Included and Surviving Mars on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Oxygen Not Included (GamingPickz Score 8.6)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Oxygen Not Included (verified)
- Lighter on storage: Oxygen Not Included (3 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Oxygen Not Included (143,589 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Colony SimBase-BuildingSurvivalResource ManagementBuildingSingleplayerManagementSimulation
Where they differ
2DIndieDifficultExplorationMultiplayerAdventure
City BuilderMarsFuturisticRTSGreat SoundtrackModdable
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Oxygen Not Included is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Surviving Mars is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Oxygen Not Included | Surviving Mars | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | Intel HD 4600 (AMD | — |
| Minimum CPU | Dual Core 2 GHz | — |
| Minimum RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Install size | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Oxygen Not Included · Surviving Mars.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Oxygen Not Included and 1 for Surviving Mars. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Oxygen Not Included and Surviving Mars in scope?
Oxygen Not Included has drawn 143,589 Steam reviews, ships 7 add-ons and installs in 3 GB. Surviving Mars has drawn 28,730 Steam reviews and installs in 6 GB.
Is Oxygen Not Included or Surviving Mars better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Oxygen Not Included rates higher (8.6 to 7.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Oxygen Not Included or Surviving Mars?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.