Prince of Persia: Warrior Within vs The Lord of the Rings: Gollum
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within is an action-adventure open-world game (2004) while The Lord of the Rings: Gollum is an action-adventure open-world game from Daedalic Entertainment (2023).
What each one is
Steam files Prince of Persia: Warrior Within under Action-Adventure and Open-World. In contrast, it files The Lord of the Rings: Gollum under Action-Adventure and Open-World.
Enter the dark underworld of Prince of Persia Warrior Within, the sword-slashing sequel to the critically acclaimed Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time™. Hunted by Dahaka, an immortal incarnation of Fate seeking divine retribution, the Prince embarks upon a path of both carnage and mystery to defy his preordained death.
Play as Gollum on his quest to retrieve his Precious. You will need to climb the mountains of Mordor, sneak around Mirkwood and make difficult choices. Who will gain the upper hand: the cunning Gollum or the innocent Smeagol?
At a glance
| Prince of Persia: Warrior Within | The Lord of the Rings: Gollum | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.3/10 | 4.3/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (83%, 4,127) | Mixed (40%, 1,521) |
| Critic aggregate | 83/100 | No aggregate |
| Price | $9.99 | $9.99 |
| Install size | — | 45 GB |
| Steam Deck | playable | playable |
| Released | 2004 | 2023 |
| Developer | — | Daedalic Entertainment |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within vs The Lord of the Rings: Gollum, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Prince of Persia: Warrior WithinAction-adventure open-world gameThe Lord of the Rings: GollumAction-adventure open-world gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Prince of Persia: Warrior WithinAction, Adventure, ParkourThe Lord of the Rings: GollumAdventure, Fantasy, Story RichThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within ✓Score 7.3 · 83% on Steam · 83 criticThe Lord of the Rings: GollumScore 4.3 · 40% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within4,127 reviewsThe Lord of the Rings: Gollum1,521 reviews · 5 add-ons · 45 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within$9.99The Lord of the Rings: Gollum$9.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Prince of Persia: Warrior WithinPlayableThe Lord of the Rings: GollumPlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole cataloguePrince of Persia: Warrior Within and The Lord of the Rings: Gollum on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- Multi-platform
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Prince of Persia: Warrior Within (GamingPickz Score 7.3)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Prince of Persia: Warrior Within (4,127 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
ActionAdventureThird PersonSingleplayerPlatformerFantasyStory RichOpen World
Where they differ
ParkourGreat SoundtrackTime TravelClassicAtmosphericHack and Slash
Lore-RichChoices MatterCinematicRPG3D Platformer3D
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Prince of Persia: Warrior Within is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. The Lord of the Rings: Gollum is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Prince of Persia: Warrior Within and 1 for The Lord of the Rings: Gollum. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Prince of Persia: Warrior Within and The Lord of the Rings: Gollum in scope?
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within has drawn 4,127 Steam reviews. The Lord of the Rings: Gollum has drawn 1,521 Steam reviews, ships 5 add-ons and installs in 45 GB.
Is Prince of Persia: Warrior Within or The Lord of the Rings: Gollum better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Prince of Persia: Warrior Within rates higher (7.3 to 4.3). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Prince of Persia: Warrior Within or The Lord of the Rings: Gollum?
Prince of Persia: Warrior Within is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $9.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.