Resident Evil (1996) vs Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour
Resident Evil (1996) is a horror puzzle game from Capcom (1996) while Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour is an FPS horror game from CAPCOM Co., Ltd. (2016).
Quick answer: Resident Evil (1996) rates higher, 8.0 to 7.5 on the GamingPickz Score, and Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour is the cheaper at Free.
What each one is
Resident Evil (1996) is filed under Horror and Puzzle. In contrast, Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour under FPS and Horror.
The game that defined the survival-horror genre is back! Check out the remastered HD version of Resident Evil.
You wake up alone on the floor of an abandoned farmhouse. Daylight is quickly fading. You must find a way out. A thrilling horror experience for the five senses. This full model change to the "Isolated View", and photorealistic graphics of RE Engine mark a new beginning for survival horror.
Story, characters and reception
Plot
See also: List of Resident Evil characters Promotional artwork created by Capcom for Resident Evil s 30th anniversary featuring some of the series' main characters: from left to right, Leon S. Kennedy , Claire Redfield , Chris Redfield , Jill Valentine , Grace Ashcroft , and Ada Wong . The early Resident Evil games focused on the Umbrella Corporation , an international pharmaceutical company that secretly develops mutagenic viruses to further their… (Wikipedia)
Reception
Most of the games in the prominent Resident Evil series have been released to positive reviews. Some of the games, most notably Resident Evil , Resident Evil 2 and Resident Evil 4 , have been bestowed with multiple Game of the Year honors and often placed on lists of the best video games ever made . In 1999, Next Generation listed the Resident Evil series as number 13 on their "Top 50 Games of All Time", commenting that, "Flawless graphics, excellent… (Wikipedia)
No Wikipedia detail on file.
At a glance
| Resident Evil (1996) | Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (92%, 36,244) | Very Positive (89%, 4,839) |
| Critic aggregate | 82/100 | 83/100 |
| Price | $19.99 | Free |
| Install size | 20 GB | — |
| Steam Deck | verified | playable |
| Released | 1996 | 2016 |
| Developer | Capcom | CAPCOM Co., Ltd. |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Resident Evil (1996) vs Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Resident Evil (1996)Horror puzzle gameResident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning HourFPS horror gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Resident Evil (1996)Survival Horror, Zombies, HorrorResident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning HourHorror, Survival Horror, GoreThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Resident Evil (1996) ✓Score 8.0 · 92% on Steam · 82 criticResident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning HourScore 7.5 · 89% on Steam · 83 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Resident Evil (1996)36,244 reviews · 20 GBResident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour4,839 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Resident Evil (1996)$19.99Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour ✓FreeRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Resident Evil (1996) ✓VerifiedResident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning HourPlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Resident Evil (1996) takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueResident Evil (1996) and Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Multi-platform
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Resident Evil (1996) (GamingPickz Score 8.0)
- The cheaper right now: Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour (Free)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Resident Evil (1996) (verified)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Resident Evil (1996) (36,244 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Survival HorrorZombiesHorrorAtmosphericSingleplayerPuzzleSurvivalAdventure
Where they differ
ClassicRemakeThird PersonFemale ProtagonistCult ClassicStory Rich
Free to PlayMultiplayerFirst-PersonViolentPsychological HorrorFPS
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Resident Evil (1996) is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Resident Evil (1996) | Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX260 | — |
| Minimum CPU | Intel® Core™ 2 Duo 2.4 GHz, AMD Athlon™ X2 2.8 GHz, | — |
| Minimum RAM | 2 GB | — |
| Install size | 20 GB | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Resident Evil (1996) · Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Resident Evil (1996) and 1 for Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Resident Evil (1996) and Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour in scope?
Resident Evil (1996) has drawn 36,244 Steam reviews and installs in 20 GB. Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour has drawn 4,839 Steam reviews.
Is Resident Evil (1996) or Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Resident Evil (1996) rates higher (8.0 to 7.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Resident Evil (1996) or Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour?
Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour is cheaper right now at Free, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Should I get Resident Evil (1996) or Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour?
Resident Evil (1996) rates higher, 8.0 to 7.5 on the GamingPickz Score, and Resident Evil 7 Teaser: Beginning Hour is the cheaper at Free. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
All comparisonsHow we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.