RISK: Global Domination vs Worms W.M.D
RISK: Global Domination is a horror strategy game from SMG Studio (2020) while Worms W.M.D is a platformer strategy game from Team17 (2016).
What each one is
Steam files RISK: Global Domination under Horror and Strategy. In contrast, it files Worms W.M.D under Platformer and Strategy.
Take over the world in RISK: Global Domination, the iconic strategy board game with 100+ original and classic maps and millions of players
Join the fight and command your worm warriors into battle in the iconic 2D arcade artillery shooter where serious strategy and silly weaponry decide who swims or sinks.
At a glance
| RISK: Global Domination | Worms W.M.D | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 |
| Steam rating | Mostly Positive (79%, 41,614) | Very Positive (85%, 14,897) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | 79/100 |
| Price | Free | $29.99 |
| Install size | 1 GB | — |
| Steam Deck | playable | playable |
| Released | 2020 | 2016 |
| Developer | SMG Studio | Team17 |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
RISK: Global Domination vs Worms W.M.D, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
RISK: Global DominationHorror strategy gameWorms W.M.DPlatformer strategy gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
RISK: Global DominationFree to Play, Board Game, StrategyWorms W.M.DStrategy, Action, Turn-Based StrategyThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
RISK: Global DominationScore 7.1 · 79% on SteamWorms W.M.D ✓Score 7.4 · 85% on Steam · 79 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
RISK: Global Domination41,614 reviews · 30 add-ons · 1 GBWorms W.M.D14,897 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
RISK: Global Domination ✓FreeWorms W.M.D$29.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
RISK: Global DominationPlayableWorms W.M.DPlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueRISK: Global Domination and Worms W.M.D on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Worms W.M.D (GamingPickz Score 7.4)
- The cheaper right now: RISK: Global Domination (Free)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: RISK: Global Domination (41,614 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
MultiplayerStrategyTurn-Based StrategyWarTurn-BasedSingleplayerCasualLocal Co-Op
Where they differ
Free to PlayBoard GameTacticalTabletopTurn-Based TacticsOnline Co-Op
ActionFunny2DCo-opShooterComedy
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, RISK: Global Domination is relaxed, easy to pick up. Worms W.M.D is relaxed, easy to pick up.
System requirements, side by side
| RISK: Global Domination | Worms W.M.D | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | DirectX 11 | — |
| Minimum CPU | Intel/AMD 2+ Cores (1.7GHz and above) | — |
| Minimum RAM | 2 GB | — |
| Install size | 1 GB | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: RISK: Global Domination · Worms W.M.D.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for RISK: Global Domination and 1 for Worms W.M.D. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are RISK: Global Domination and Worms W.M.D in scope?
RISK: Global Domination has drawn 41,614 Steam reviews, ships 30 add-ons and installs in 1 GB. Worms W.M.D has drawn 14,897 Steam reviews.
Is RISK: Global Domination or Worms W.M.D better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Worms W.M.D rates higher (7.4 to 7.1). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, RISK: Global Domination or Worms W.M.D?
RISK: Global Domination is cheaper right now at Free, against $29.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.