GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Squad vs World War 3

Squad is an FPS mmorpg game from Offworld (2020) while World War 3 is an FPS game from New Generation Games (2022).

Squad

2020 · Offworld

7.7GamingPickz Score

$39.99

Steam: Very Positive

World War 3

2022 · New Generation Games

5.5GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Mixed

What each one is

Steam files Squad under FPS and Mmorpg. In contrast, it files World War 3 under FPS.

Squad

Squad is a tactical FPS that provides authentic combat experiences through teamwork, communication, and realistic combat. It bridges the gap between arcade shooter and military realism with 100-player battles, combined-arms warfare, and base building.

Description from its Steam store page

World War 3

World War 3 is a free-to-play tactical online multiplayer FPS where the world is your battleground. Outgun the enemy in thrilling, team-based skirmishes with a huge arsenal of weapons, vehicles, gadgets, and drones at your disposal.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

SquadWorld War 3
GamingPickz Score7.7/105.5/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (81%, 242,753)Mixed (54%, 54,564)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$39.99Free
Install size65 GB80 GB
Steam Deckplayableunsupported
Released20202022
DeveloperOffworldNew Generation Games

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Squad vs World War 3, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    SquadFPS mmorpg game
    World War 3FPS game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    SquadMilitary, Realistic, FPS
    World War 3Free to Play, FPS, Realistic

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    SquadScore 7.7 · 81% on Steam
    World War 3Score 5.5 · 54% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Squad242,753 reviews · 23 add-ons · 65 GB
    World War 354,564 reviews · 80 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Squad$39.99
    World War 3Free

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    SquadPlayable
    World War 3Unsupported

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Squad takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Squad and World War 3 on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Squad (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
  • The cheaper right now: World War 3 (Free)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Squad (playable)
  • Lighter on storage: Squad (65 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Squad (242,753 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

MilitaryRealisticFPSMultiplayerTacticalShooterTeam-BasedWar

Where they differ

Squad is also

Massively MultiplayerStrategySimulationWargameBase-BuildingOpen World

World War 3 is also

Free to PlayOnline Co-OpGun CustomizationCharacter CustomizationCombatVehicular Combat

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Squad is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. World War 3 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

SquadWorld War 3
Minimum GPUNvidia GTX 1060 6GBGeforce GTX 670/ GTX 1650
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5-8400, AMD Ryzen 3600Intel Core i3-4340K / AMD FX-6300
Minimum RAM8 GB8 GB
Install size65 GB80 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Squad · World War 3.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Squad and 1 for World War 3. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Squad and World War 3 in scope?

Squad has drawn 242,753 Steam reviews, ships 23 add-ons and installs in 65 GB. World War 3 has drawn 54,564 Steam reviews and installs in 80 GB.

Is Squad or World War 3 better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Squad rates higher (7.7 to 5.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Squad or World War 3?

World War 3 is cheaper right now at Free, against $39.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each