Star Wars: Battlefront II vs Star Wars: The Old Republic
Star Wars: Battlefront II is an FPS game from Pandemic Studios (2005) while Star Wars: The Old Republic is an action-RPG mmorpg game (2011).
Quick answer: Star Wars: The Old Republic rates higher, 7.9 to 7.5 on the GamingPickz Score, and Star Wars: The Old Republic is the cheaper at Free.
What each one is
Star Wars: Battlefront II is filed under FPS. In contrast, Star Wars: The Old Republic under Action-RPG and Mmorpg.
Be the hero in the ultimate STAR WARS™ battle fantasy with STAR WARS™ Battlefront™ II: Celebration Edition!
STAR WARS™: The Old Republic™ is a free-to-play MMORPG that puts you at the center of your own story-driven saga. Play as a Jedi, Sith, Bounty Hunter, or one of many other iconic STAR WARS roles in the galaxy far, far away over three thousand years before the classic films.
Story, characters and reception
No Wikipedia detail on file.
Plot
This story takes place in the Star Wars fictional universe shortly after the establishment of a tenuous peace between the re-emergent Sith Empire and the Galactic Republic , 300 years after the events of the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic games, and more than 3,600 years before the events in the Star Wars films. The Jedi are held responsible for the success of the Sith during the devastating 28-year-long Great Galactic War (which led to the Treaty… (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception Upon release, the game received praise for its voice acting and class story arcs, while criticism focused on repetitive endgame content and server queue issues. With a score of 85 on Metacritic and an 84% on GameRankings . G4TV gave a review of 5/5 and praised the game for "Top notch music and voice acting" and "hundreds of hours of content". (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| Star Wars: Battlefront II | Star Wars: The Old Republic | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.5/10 | 7.9/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (88%, 99,746) | Very Positive (90%, 75,206) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | 85/100 |
| Price | $39.99 | Free |
| Install size | 60 GB | 75 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Developer | Pandemic Studios | — |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Star Wars: Battlefront II vs Star Wars: The Old Republic, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Star Wars: Battlefront IIFPS gameStar Wars: The Old RepublicAction-RPG mmorpg gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Star Wars: Battlefront IIShooter, Action, Third-Person ShooterStar Wars: The Old RepublicFree to Play, MMORPG, Character CustomizationThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Star Wars: Battlefront IIScore 7.5 · 88% on SteamStar Wars: The Old Republic ✓Score 7.9 · 90% on Steam · 85 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Star Wars: Battlefront II99,746 reviews · 60 GBStar Wars: The Old Republic75,206 reviews · 3 add-ons · 75 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Star Wars: Battlefront II$39.99Star Wars: The Old Republic ✓FreeRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Star Wars: Battlefront IIUnsupportedStar Wars: The Old Republic ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Star Wars: The Old Republic takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueStar Wars: Battlefront II and Star Wars: The Old Republic on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Multi-platform
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Star Wars: The Old Republic (GamingPickz Score 7.9)
- The cheaper right now: Star Wars: The Old Republic (Free)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Star Wars: The Old Republic (playable)
- Lighter on storage: Star Wars: Battlefront II (60 GB)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
MultiplayerActionSpaceSci-fiThird PersonAdventurePvPController
Where they differ
ShooterSingleplayerThird-Person ShooterFPSCo-opCombat
Free to PlayMMORPGOpen WorldRPGStory RichChoices Matter
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Star Wars: Battlefront II is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Star Wars: The Old Republic is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Star Wars: Battlefront II | Star Wars: The Old Republic | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | — |
| Minimum CPU | Processor (AMD): AMD FX 6350 Processor (Intel): Intel Core i5 6600K | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4000+ |
| Minimum RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Install size | 60 GB | 75 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Star Wars: Battlefront II · Star Wars: The Old Republic.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Star Wars: Battlefront II and 0 for Star Wars: The Old Republic. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Star Wars: Battlefront II and Star Wars: The Old Republic in scope?
Star Wars: Battlefront II has drawn 99,746 Steam reviews and installs in 60 GB. Star Wars: The Old Republic has drawn 75,206 Steam reviews, ships 3 add-ons and installs in 75 GB.
Is Star Wars: Battlefront II or Star Wars: The Old Republic better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Star Wars: The Old Republic rates higher (7.9 to 7.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Star Wars: Battlefront II or Star Wars: The Old Republic?
Star Wars: The Old Republic is cheaper right now at Free, against $39.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Should I get Star Wars: Battlefront II or Star Wars: The Old Republic?
Star Wars: The Old Republic rates higher, 7.9 to 7.5 on the GamingPickz Score, and Star Wars: The Old Republic is the cheaper at Free. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
All comparisonsHow we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.