STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) vs Star Wars: Rogue Squadron
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) is an FPS strategy game from Pandemic Studios (2009) while Star Wars: Rogue Squadron is an FPS game from Lucasfilm Games (1998).
Quick answer: Star Wars: Rogue Squadron has the higher Metacritic, 85 to 78.
Star Wars: Rogue Squadron
What each one is
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) is filed under FPS and Strategy. In contrast, Star Wars: Rogue Squadron under FPS.
Join the rise of Darth Vader’s elite 501st Legion of Stormtroopers as you fight through an all new story-based saga where every action you take impacts the battlefront and, ultimately, the fate of the Star Wars galaxy.
Star Wars: Rogue Squadron or Star Wars: Rogue Squadron 3D is an arcade-style flight action game co-developed by Factor 5 and LucasArts. The first of the Rogue Squadron trilogy, it was published by LucasArts and Nintendo and released for Microsoft Windows and Nintendo 64 in December 1998. The game's story was influenced by the Star Wars: X-wing – Rogue Squadron comics and is set in the fictional Star Wars galaxy, taking place primarily between events in the films Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back. The player controls Luke Skywalker, commander of the elite X-wing pilots known as Rogue Squadron. As the game progresses, Skywalker and Rogue Squadron fight the Galactic Empire in 16 missions across various planets.
Story, characters and reception
No Wikipedia detail on file.
Plot
Setting Star Wars: Rogue Squadron is set in the fictional Star Wars galaxy, where a war is fought between the Galactic Empire and the Rebel Alliance. The game's first fifteen levels occur six months after the Battle of Yavin as depicted in A New Hope and before the events of The Empire Strikes Back . As the Empire gathers strength for an all-out assault on the Rebel forces, Luke Skywalker and Wedge Antilles form Rogue Squadron, a group comprising twelve… (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception The R2 unit and exhaust flames on the player's X-wing are examples of graphical detail that reviewers praised. Many reviews compared Star Wars: Rogue Squadron to one of its inspirations, the Battle of Hoth flight combat level in Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire , considered one of that game's best elements. GamePro remarked that Rogue Squadron "enhanced the flight model with true pitch, roll, and bank mechanics". (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) | Star Wars: Rogue Squadron | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.1/10 | — |
| Steam rating | Overwhelmingly Positive (95%, 54,262) | — |
| Critic aggregate | 78/100 | 85/100 |
| Price | $9.99 | Unknown |
| Install size | — | — |
| Steam Deck | playable | Untested |
| Released | 2009 | 1998 |
| Developer | Pandemic Studios | Lucasfilm Games |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) vs Star Wars: Rogue Squadron, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005)FPS strategy gameStar Wars: Rogue SquadronFPS gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005)Action, Shooter, ClassicStar Wars: Rogue SquadronNo descriptive tagsThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005)Metacritic 78Star Wars: Rogue Squadron ✓Metacritic 85Metacritic's critic aggregate, from the game's Wikipedia reception where it was never on Steam.
Content and scale
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005)54,262 reviewsStar Wars: Rogue Squadron—Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005)$9.99Star Wars: Rogue SquadronUnknownRead live from Steam and subject to change.
Star Wars: Rogue Squadron takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The better reviewed of the two: Star Wars: Rogue Squadron (Metacritic 85)
Where they differ
ActionMultiplayerShooterClassicThird-Person ShooterSci-fi
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Star Wars: Rogue Squadron is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) | Star Wars: Rogue Squadron | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | 64MB 3d Graphics card with Vertex Shader and Pixel Shader (VS/PS) Capability | — |
| Minimum CPU | Intel Pentium 4 1.5 GHz | — |
| Minimum RAM | 0.3 GB | — |
| Install size | — | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) · Star Wars: Rogue Squadron.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) and 0 for Star Wars: Rogue Squadron. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) and Star Wars: Rogue Squadron in scope?
STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) has drawn 54,262 Steam reviews. Star Wars: Rogue Squadron lists little scope data.
Is STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) or Star Wars: Rogue Squadron better?
Neither carries enough reviews for us to score it reliably, so we do not call a winner. The table above shows what each does have.
Which is cheaper, STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) or Star Wars: Rogue Squadron?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Should I get STAR WARS Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) or Star Wars: Rogue Squadron?
Star Wars: Rogue Squadron has the higher Metacritic, 85 to 78. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
All comparisonsHow we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.