Steins;Gate vs The Walking Dead
Steins;Gate is an action-adventure horror game from 5pb. Inc. (2009) while The Walking Dead is a horror survival game from Telltale Games (2012).
Quick answer: The Walking Dead rates higher, 8.4 to 8.3 on the GamingPickz Score, and The Walking Dead is the cheaper at $14.99.
What each one is
Steins;Gate is filed under Action-Adventure and Horror. In contrast, The Walking Dead under Horror and Survival.
Developed by 5pb. and Nitroplus, STEINS;GATE was awarded Famitsu magazine's coveted annual Game of Excellence award and was voted one of the most emotionally charged “tear-inducing games” ever made, in a Famitsu poll. It is a gripping and moving Visual Novel, which has already spawned manga and anime adaptations.
A five-part adventure horror series set in the same universe as Robert Kirkman’s award-winning comic book series.
Story, characters and reception
Plot
Setting and themes Steins;Gate is set in the summer of 2010, approximately one year after the events that took place in Chaos;Head , in Akihabara . Physical locales of Akihabara like the Radio Kaikan building can be spotted in the game. According to Chiyomaru Shikura, who headed the planning of Steins;Gate , Akihabara was chosen because it is an easy place for acquiring hardware parts, which makes it the ideal place for people interested in inventing and… (Wikipedia)
Characters
Rintaro "Okarin" Okabe ( 岡部 倫太郎 , Okabe Rintarō ) Main article: Rintaro Okabe The player assumes the role of Rintaro Okabe , the protagonist of Steins;Gate . Okabe is an eccentric individual, a self-proclaimed mad scientist who often goes by the pseudonym Kyouma Hououin ( 鳳凰院 凶真 , Hōōin Kyōma ) . Mayuri and Daru call him "Okarin" ( オカリン ) , a portmanteau of his surname and given name. (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception Reviews In 2009, the Famitsu Awards gave Steins;Gate visual novel an annual Game of Excellence award. In 2011, it was voted #6 in Famitsu ' s poll of "most tear-inducing games" of all time. Steins;Gate was nominated for the 2015 Golden Joystick Award in the "Best Handheld / Mobile Game" category. (Wikipedia)
No Wikipedia detail on file.
At a glance
| Steins;Gate | The Walking Dead | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 |
| Steam rating | Overwhelmingly Positive (97%, 26,892) | Overwhelmingly Positive (97%, 80,414) |
| Critic aggregate | 87/100 | 82/100 |
| Price | $29.99 | $14.99 |
| Install size | 13 GB | — |
| Steam Deck | playable | verified |
| Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Developer | 5pb. Inc. | Telltale Games |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Steins;Gate vs The Walking Dead, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Steins;GateAction-adventure horror gameThe Walking DeadHorror survival gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Steins;GateVisual Novel, Story Rich, AnimeThe Walking DeadZombies, Story Rich, AdventureThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Steins;GateScore 8.3 · 97% on Steam · 87 criticThe Walking Dead ✓Score 8.4 · 97% on Steam · 82 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Steins;Gate26,892 reviews · 13 GBThe Walking Dead80,414 reviews · 1 add-onReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Steins;Gate$29.99The Walking Dead ✓$14.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Steins;GatePlayableThe Walking Dead ✓VerifiedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
The Walking Dead takes 3 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueSteins;Gate and The Walking Dead on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- Mobile
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The cheaper right now: The Walking Dead ($14.99)
- Better on a Steam Deck: The Walking Dead (verified)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: The Walking Dead (80,414 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Story RichChoices MatterSingleplayerAdventureAtmosphericHorror
Where they differ
Visual NovelAnimeTime TravelSci-fiGreat SoundtrackMultiple Endings
ZombiesPoint & ClickEpisodicDramaEmotionalMature
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Steins;Gate is relaxed, easy to pick up. The Walking Dead is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Steins;Gate | The Walking Dead | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | — |
| Minimum CPU | — | 2.0 GHz Pentium 4 |
| Minimum RAM | — | 3 GB |
| Install size | 13 GB | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Steins;Gate · The Walking Dead.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Steins;Gate and 1 for The Walking Dead. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Steins;Gate and The Walking Dead in scope?
Steins;Gate has drawn 26,892 Steam reviews and installs in 13 GB. The Walking Dead has drawn 80,414 Steam reviews and ships 1 add-on.
Is Steins;Gate or The Walking Dead better?
By the GamingPickz Score, The Walking Dead rates higher (8.4 to 8.3). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Steins;Gate or The Walking Dead?
The Walking Dead is cheaper right now at $14.99, against $29.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Should I get Steins;Gate or The Walking Dead?
The Walking Dead rates higher, 8.4 to 8.3 on the GamingPickz Score, and The Walking Dead is the cheaper at $14.99. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.