Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade vs Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade is a mmorpg game from Behaviour Interactive Inc. (2016) while Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War is a strategy game from Proxy Studios (2018).
Quick answer: Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War rates higher, 7.1 to 4.9 on the GamingPickz Score.
What each one is
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade is filed under Mmorpg. In contrast, Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War under Strategy.
Eldar, Orks, Chaos or Space Marines, in the fiercest battles for universal peace, through any means. Try the Free Demo - or buy the Full Premium Game below. We will not give up.
Warhammer 40,000: Gladius – Relics of War brings you to a world of terror and violence. Four factions will engage in a brutal war for dominance over the planet’s resources. In the first turn-based 4X strategy game set in Warhammer 40,000 you will lead one of four unique factions.
Story, characters and reception
Reception
Reception Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade received "mixed or average" reviews according to review aggregator Metacritic . ^ "Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade for PC Reviews" . Metacritic . (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception Gladius – Relics of War received "mixed or average" reviews according to review aggregator Metacritic . Leana Hafer of IGN called Gladius "a really well-done, turn-based 40K wargame. " Tom Senior of PC Gamer summarized that the game is "[a] plodding and predictable 4X strategy game that's relaxing in its own way, but rarely challenging. (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade | Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 4.9/10 | 7.1/10 |
| Steam rating | Mixed (50%, 12,500) | Very Positive (82%, 18,647) |
| Critic aggregate | 52/100 | 71/100 |
| Price | Not listed | $39.99 |
| Install size | 40 GB | 4 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2016 | 2018 |
| Developer | Behaviour Interactive Inc. | Proxy Studios |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade vs Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeMmorpg gameWarhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of WarStrategy gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeWarhammer 40K, Action, Third-Person ShooterWarhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of WarStrategy, Warhammer 40K, 4XThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeScore 4.9 · 50% on Steam · 52 criticWarhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War ✓Score 7.1 · 82% on Steam · 71 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade12,500 reviews · 40 GBWarhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War18,647 reviews · 21 add-ons · 4 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeNot listedWarhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War$39.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeUnsupportedWarhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueWarhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade and Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War (GamingPickz Score 7.1)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War (playable)
- Lighter on storage: Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War (4 GB)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
Warhammer 40KGames WorkshopMultiplayerSci-fiCo-opTactical
Where they differ
ActionThird-Person ShooterFree to PlayMassively MultiplayerPvPAdventure
Strategy4XTurn-Based StrategyTurn-BasedHex GridTurn-Based Tactics
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade | Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | Vulkan support with 3 GB |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel Core i3 |
| Minimum RAM | — | 4 GB |
| Install size | 40 GB | 4 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade · Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade and 1 for Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade and Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War in scope?
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade has drawn 12,500 Steam reviews and installs in 40 GB. Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War has drawn 18,647 Steam reviews, ships 21 add-ons and installs in 4 GB.
Is Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade or Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War rates higher (7.1 to 4.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade or Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Should I get Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade or Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War?
Warhammer 40,000: Gladius - Relics of War rates higher, 7.1 to 4.9 on the GamingPickz Score. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
All comparisonsHow we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.