Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade vs Warhammer: Chaosbane
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade is a mmorpg game from Behaviour Interactive Inc. (2016) while Warhammer: Chaosbane is an action-RPG RPG game from Eko Software (2019).
Quick answer: Warhammer: Chaosbane rates higher, 5.7 to 4.9 on the GamingPickz Score.
What each one is
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade is filed under Mmorpg. In contrast, Warhammer: Chaosbane under Action-RPG and RPG.
Eldar, Orks, Chaos or Space Marines, in the fiercest battles for universal peace, through any means. Try the Free Demo - or buy the Full Premium Game below. We will not give up.
In a world ravaged by war and dominated by magic, you must rise up to face the Chaos hordes. Playing solo or with up to four players in local or online co-op, choose a hero from four character classes and prepare for epic battles wielding some of the most powerful artefacts of the Old World.
Story, characters and reception
Reception
Reception Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade received "mixed or average" reviews according to review aggregator Metacritic . ^ "Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade for PC Reviews" . Metacritic . (Wikipedia)
Plot
Chaosbane is set just after the "Great War Against Chaos", two hundred years prior to the setting of Warhammer Fantasy . The player character is a personal champion of Magnus the Pious, slayer of the Chaos Everchosen Asavar Kul, and soon to become Emperor of the fractured Empire. The player selects one of six characters with their own unique skill sets. (Wikipedia)
Reception
Reception Warhammer: Chaosbane received "mixed or average" reviews for Microsoft Windows , PlayStation 4 , Xbox One , and PlayStation 5 , and "generally positive" reviews for Xbox Series X/S , according to review aggregator website Metacritic . Writing for IGN , Leana Hafer gave the game an 8. 7 out of 10, writing, "This action-RPG has it where it counts, with fun classes, good boss fights, and a decent loot system. (Wikipedia)
At a glance
| Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade | Warhammer: Chaosbane | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 4.9/10 | 5.7/10 |
| Steam rating | Mixed (50%, 12,500) | Mixed (58%, 6,473) |
| Critic aggregate | 52/100 | 69/100 |
| Price | Not listed | $29.99 |
| Install size | 40 GB | 20 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | unsupported |
| Released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Developer | Behaviour Interactive Inc. | Eko Software |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade vs Warhammer: Chaosbane, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeMmorpg gameWarhammer: ChaosbaneAction-RPG RPG gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeWarhammer 40K, Action, Third-Person ShooterWarhammer: ChaosbanePvE, RPG, Co-op CampaignThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeScore 4.9 · 50% on Steam · 52 criticWarhammer: Chaosbane ✓Score 5.7 · 58% on Steam · 69 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade12,500 reviews · 40 GBWarhammer: Chaosbane6,473 reviews · 13 add-ons · 20 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeNot listedWarhammer: Chaosbane$29.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal CrusadeUnsupportedWarhammer: ChaosbaneUnsupportedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Warhammer: Chaosbane takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueWarhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade and Warhammer: Chaosbane on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Warhammer: Chaosbane (GamingPickz Score 5.7)
- Lighter on storage: Warhammer: Chaosbane (20 GB)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
ActionMultiplayerCo-opAdventurePvECharacter CustomizationViolent
Where they differ
Warhammer 40KThird-Person ShooterFree to PlayMassively MultiplayerPvPGames Workshop
SingleplayerRPGCo-op CampaignHack and SlashAction RPGIsometric
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade is demanding, for players who want a challenge. Warhammer: Chaosbane is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade | Warhammer: Chaosbane | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 660 |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel® Core i3 |
| Minimum RAM | — | 6 GB |
| Install size | 40 GB | 20 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade · Warhammer: Chaosbane.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade and 1 for Warhammer: Chaosbane. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade and Warhammer: Chaosbane in scope?
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade has drawn 12,500 Steam reviews and installs in 40 GB. Warhammer: Chaosbane has drawn 6,473 Steam reviews, ships 13 add-ons and installs in 20 GB.
Is Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade or Warhammer: Chaosbane better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Warhammer: Chaosbane rates higher (5.7 to 4.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade or Warhammer: Chaosbane?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Should I get Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade or Warhammer: Chaosbane?
Warhammer: Chaosbane rates higher, 5.7 to 4.9 on the GamingPickz Score. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
All comparisonsHow we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.