GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

ArcheBlade vs Gigantic

ArcheBlade is a fighting mmorpg game from CodeBrush Games (2014) while Gigantic is an FPS open-world game from Motiga Inc. (2017).

ArcheBlade

2014 · CodeBrush Games

6.4GamingPickz Score

Free

Steam: Mostly Positive

Gigantic

2017 · Motiga Inc.

6.8GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Mostly Positive

What each one is

Steam files ArcheBlade under Fighting and Mmorpg. In contrast, it files Gigantic under FPS and Open-World.

ArcheBlade

ArcheBlade is a free to play 3D multiplayer fighting game that captures the essence of combo-based fighting games combined with unique game modes. Play as one of many characters and master your skills to become the best fighter.

Description from its Steam store page

Gigantic

Gigantic is a fast and fluid Strategic Hero Shooter, where you battle against and alongside massive Guardians, in deeply strategic team gameplay. Think fast, be bold, Go Gigantic!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

ArcheBladeGigantic
GamingPickz Score6.4/106.8/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (73%, 7,616)Mostly Positive (77%, 7,389)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate76/100
PriceFreeNot listed
Install size10 GB
Steam DeckunsupportedUntested
Released20142017
DeveloperCodeBrush GamesMotiga Inc.

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

ArcheBlade vs Gigantic, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    ArcheBladeFighting mmorpg game
    GiganticFPS open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    ArcheBladeFree to Play, Anime, Action
    GiganticFree to Play, MOBA, Action

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    ArcheBladeScore 6.4 · 73% on Steam
    GiganticScore 6.8 · 77% on Steam · 76 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    ArcheBlade7,616 reviews
    Gigantic7,389 reviews · 10 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    ArcheBladeFree
    GiganticNot listed

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

Gigantic takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

ArcheBlade and Gigantic on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityGiganticArcheBlade

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Gigantic (GamingPickz Score 6.8)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Free to PlayAnimeActionMultiplayerMassively MultiplayerMOBAPvPThird Person

Where they differ

ArcheBlade is also

FightingIndieMMORPGHack and SlashFemale ProtagonistOnline Co-Op

Gigantic is also

StrategyShooterFPSControllerOpen WorldHero Shooter

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, ArcheBlade is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Gigantic is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

ArcheBladeGigantic
Minimum GPUATI HD3850GeForce GTX 580
Minimum CPUIntel Core 2 Duo 1.86 GHz, AMD Athlon 64 X2 2GHz2.6Ghz processor
Minimum RAM2 GB6 GB
Install size10 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: ArcheBlade · Gigantic.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for ArcheBlade and 1 for Gigantic. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are ArcheBlade and Gigantic in scope?

ArcheBlade has drawn 7,616 Steam reviews. Gigantic has drawn 7,389 Steam reviews and installs in 10 GB.

Is ArcheBlade or Gigantic better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Gigantic rates higher (6.8 to 6.4). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, ArcheBlade or Gigantic?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each