GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

ARK: Survival Of The Fittest vs PixARK

ARK: Survival Of The Fittest is an FPS mmorpg game from Studio Wildcard (2017) while PixARK is an FPS mmorpg game from Snail Games USA (2019).

ARK: Survival Of The Fittest

2017 · Studio Wildcard

6.0GamingPickz Score

Not listed

Steam: Mixed

PixARK

2019 · Snail Games USA

6.4GamingPickz Score

$4.99

Steam: Mostly Positive

What each one is

Steam files ARK: Survival Of The Fittest under FPS and Mmorpg. In contrast, it files PixARK under FPS and Mmorpg.

ARK: Survival Of The Fittest

ARK: The Survival of the Fittest is a prototype spin-off of ARK: Survival Evolved, pitting up to 60 combatants against each other in a fast-paced, action-packed struggle for survival, where players are ultimately pushed into an epic final showdown leading their Dinosaur Armies into battle.

Description from its Steam store page

PixARK

Enter a world of mystery, danger, ancient dinosaurs, mythical beasts, and cubes! Work by yourself or with a tribe of others to gather materials, craft useful items, tame wild creatures, and build huge bases to survive in PixARK!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

ARK: Survival Of The FittestPixARK
GamingPickz Score6.0/106.4/10
Steam ratingMixed (66%, 11,804)Mostly Positive (72%, 13,440)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
PriceNot listed$4.99
Install size36.13 GB15 GB
Steam DeckUntestedplayable
Released20172019
DeveloperStudio WildcardSnail Games USA

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

ARK: Survival Of The Fittest vs PixARK, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    ARK: Survival Of The FittestFPS mmorpg game
    PixARKFPS mmorpg game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    ARK: Survival Of The FittestFree to Play, Survival, Dinosaurs
    PixARKSurvival, Open World, Adventure

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    ARK: Survival Of The FittestScore 6.0 · 66% on Steam
    PixARKScore 6.4 · 72% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    ARK: Survival Of The Fittest11,804 reviews · 36.13 GB
    PixARK13,440 reviews · 10 add-ons · 15 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    ARK: Survival Of The FittestNot listed
    PixARK$4.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

PixARK takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

ARK: Survival Of The Fittest and PixARK on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityARK: Survival Of The Fit…

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: PixARK (GamingPickz Score 6.4)
  • Lighter on storage: PixARK (15 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SurvivalDinosaursMultiplayerOpen WorldActionAdventureMassively MultiplayerPvP

Where they differ

ARK: Survival Of The Fittest is also

Free to PlayDragonsEarly AccessFirst-PersonSingleplayerExploration

PixARK is also

Pixel GraphicsCasualBuildingVoxelCo-opBase-Building

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, ARK: Survival Of The Fittest is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. PixARK is relaxed, easy to pick up.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for ARK: Survival Of The Fittest and 1 for PixARK. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are ARK: Survival Of The Fittest and PixARK in scope?

ARK: Survival Of The Fittest has drawn 11,804 Steam reviews and installs in 36.13 GB. PixARK has drawn 13,440 Steam reviews, ships 10 add-ons and installs in 15 GB.

Is ARK: Survival Of The Fittest or PixARK better?

By the GamingPickz Score, PixARK rates higher (6.4 to 6.0). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, ARK: Survival Of The Fittest or PixARK?

One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each