GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Call of Duty: World at War vs Dino D-Day

Call of Duty: World at War is an FPS horror game from Treyarch (2008) while Dino D-Day is an FPS open-world game from 800 North and Digital Ranch (2011).

Call of Duty: World at War

2008 · Treyarch

8.1GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

Dino D-Day

2011 · 800 North and Digital Ranch

6.8GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Call of Duty: World at War under FPS and Horror. In contrast, it files Dino D-Day under FPS and Open-World.

Call of Duty: World at War

Call of Duty is back, redefining war like you've never experienced before. Building on the Call of Duty 4®: Modern Warfare engine, Call of Duty: World at War immerses players into the most gritty and chaotic WWII combat ever experienced.

Description from its Steam store page

Dino D-Day

Frantic, multiplayer action involving Nazis and dinosaurs! What are you waiting for? This is World War II as it should have been!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Call of Duty: World at WarDino D-Day
GamingPickz Score8.1/106.8/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (92%, 53,215)Very Positive (84%, 15,117)
Critic aggregate83/10053/100
Price$19.99$9.99
Install size
Steam Deckunsupportedplayable
Released20082011
DeveloperTreyarch800 North and Digital Ranch

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Call of Duty: World at War vs Dino D-Day, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Call of Duty: World at WarFPS horror game
    Dino D-DayFPS open-world game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Call of Duty: World at WarZombies, World War II, FPS
    Dino D-DayDinosaurs, Action, World War II

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Call of Duty: World at WarScore 8.1 · 92% on Steam · 83 critic
    Dino D-DayScore 6.8 · 84% on Steam · 53 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Call of Duty: World at War53,215 reviews
    Dino D-Day15,117 reviews · 2 add-ons

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Call of Duty: World at War$19.99
    Dino D-Day$9.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Call of Duty: World at WarUnsupported
    Dino D-DayPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Dino D-Day takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Call of Duty: World at War and Dino D-Day on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityDino D-Day

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Call of Duty: World at War (GamingPickz Score 8.1)
  • The cheaper right now: Dino D-Day ($9.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: Dino D-Day (playable)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Call of Duty: World at War (53,215 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

World War IIFPSMultiplayerActionShooterCo-opFirst-PersonWar

Where they differ

Call of Duty: World at War is also

ZombiesSingleplayerModdableOnline Co-OpClassicGreat Soundtrack

Dino D-Day is also

DinosaursIndieComedyFunnyThird PersonAlternate History

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Call of Duty: World at War is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Dino D-Day is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Call of Duty: World at WarDino D-Day
Minimum GPU
Minimum CPUPentium 4 @ 3 GHz/AMD 64 3200+
Minimum RAM0.5 GB
Install size

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Call of Duty: World at War · Dino D-Day.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Call of Duty: World at War and 0 for Dino D-Day. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Call of Duty: World at War and Dino D-Day in scope?

Call of Duty: World at War has drawn 53,215 Steam reviews. Dino D-Day has drawn 15,117 Steam reviews and ships 2 add-ons.

Is Call of Duty: World at War or Dino D-Day better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Call of Duty: World at War rates higher (8.1 to 6.8). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Call of Duty: World at War or Dino D-Day?

Dino D-Day is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each