Copa Petrobras de Marcas vs Need for Speed Undercover
Copa Petrobras de Marcas is an FPS open-world game from Reiza Studios (2015) while Need for Speed Undercover is an open-world racing game from EA Black Box (2008).
What each one is
Steam files Copa Petrobras de Marcas under FPS and Open-World. In contrast, it files Need for Speed Undercover under Open-World and Racing.
COPA PETROBRAS DE MARCAS is a 100% free official game simulating the thrill of competing wheel-to-wheel with models from various automakers in some of the main Brazilian race tracks.
You never thought it would turn out like this. An all-out chase where you're the hunted. And the hunter. Now you must get behind the wheel and risk everything to infiltrate a ruthless international crime syndicate and take them down.
At a glance
| Copa Petrobras de Marcas | Need for Speed Undercover | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 5.9/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Steam rating | Mixed (68%, 2,903) | Mostly Positive (75%, 8,006) |
| Critic aggregate | No aggregate | 65/100 |
| Price | Free | Not listed |
| Install size | 2 GB | — |
| Steam Deck | playable | playable |
| Released | 2015 | 2008 |
| Developer | Reiza Studios | EA Black Box |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Copa Petrobras de Marcas vs Need for Speed Undercover, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Copa Petrobras de MarcasFPS open-world gameNeed for Speed UndercoverOpen-world racing gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Copa Petrobras de MarcasRacing, Automobile Sim, Free to PlayNeed for Speed UndercoverRacing, Open World, ActionThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Copa Petrobras de MarcasScore 5.9 · 68% on SteamNeed for Speed Undercover ✓Score 6.5 · 75% on Steam · 65 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Copa Petrobras de Marcas2,903 reviews · 2 GBNeed for Speed Undercover8,006 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Copa Petrobras de MarcasFreeNeed for Speed UndercoverNot listedRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Copa Petrobras de MarcasPlayableNeed for Speed UndercoverPlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Need for Speed Undercover takes 1 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueCopa Petrobras de Marcas and Need for Speed Undercover on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The higher-rated of the two: Need for Speed Undercover (GamingPickz Score 6.5)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Need for Speed Undercover (8,006 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
RacingAutomobile SimMultiplayerSimulationActionSingleplayerControllerDriving
Where they differ
Free to PlaySportsCo-opFirst-PersonMassively MultiplayerFPS
Story RichClassic
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Copa Petrobras de Marcas is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Need for Speed Undercover is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Copa Petrobras de Marcas | Need for Speed Undercover | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | — | 128 MB |
| Minimum CPU | — | Intel Pentium® 4 |
| Minimum RAM | — | — |
| Install size | 2 GB | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Copa Petrobras de Marcas · Need for Speed Undercover.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Copa Petrobras de Marcas and 1 for Need for Speed Undercover. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Copa Petrobras de Marcas and Need for Speed Undercover in scope?
Copa Petrobras de Marcas has drawn 2,903 Steam reviews and installs in 2 GB. Need for Speed Undercover has drawn 8,006 Steam reviews.
Is Copa Petrobras de Marcas or Need for Speed Undercover better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Need for Speed Undercover rates higher (6.5 to 5.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Copa Petrobras de Marcas or Need for Speed Undercover?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.