Darwin Project vs Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Darwin Project is an FPS open-world game from Scavengers Studio (2020) while Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands is an FPS open-world game from Ubisoft Paris (2017).
What each one is
Steam files Darwin Project under FPS and Open-World. In contrast, it files Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands under FPS and Open-World.
In Darwin Project, ten inmates must survive the elements, track each other, fight, craft tools, and use their social skills to be the last one standing. It's a unique take on battle royale with a Show Director to influence the match and Spectator Interactions to create a one-of-a-kind game show.
Lead your elite team of Ghosts in this tactical third-person shooter. Explore a massive open world, infiltrate and destroy the deadly Santa Blanca cartel, and save Bolivia and its people.
At a glance
| Darwin Project | Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 7.2/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Steam rating | Very Positive (82%, 18,460) | Mostly Positive (78%, 113,815) |
| Critic aggregate | 74/100 | No aggregate |
| Price | Free | $49.99 |
| Install size | 6 GB | 50 GB |
| Steam Deck | unsupported | playable |
| Released | 2020 | 2017 |
| Developer | Scavengers Studio | Ubisoft Paris |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Darwin Project vs Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Darwin ProjectFPS open-world gameTom Clancy's Ghost Recon WildlandsFPS open-world gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Darwin ProjectBattle Royale, Survival, ActionTom Clancy's Ghost Recon WildlandsOpen World, Shooter, Co-opThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Darwin ProjectScore 7.2 · 82% on Steam · 74 criticTom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands ✓Score 7.3 · 78% on SteamThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Darwin Project18,460 reviews · 6 GBTom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands113,815 reviews · 8 add-ons · 50 GBReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Darwin Project ✓FreeTom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands$49.99Read live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Darwin ProjectUnsupportedTom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands ✓PlayableValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueDarwin Project and Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The cheaper right now: Darwin Project (Free)
- Better on a Steam Deck: Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands (playable)
- Lighter on storage: Darwin Project (6 GB)
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands (113,815 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
MultiplayerSurvivalActionPvPOpen WorldCo-opShooterAdventure
Where they differ
Battle RoyaleEarly AccessIndieMassively MultiplayerCraftingCasual
StealthTacticalMilitaryOnline Co-OpSandboxFirst-Person
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Darwin Project is relaxed, easy to pick up. Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.
System requirements, side by side
| Darwin Project | Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX660 / AMD R9 270X (2GB |
| Minimum CPU | Dual Core 2.4Ghz+ | Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.5 GHz |
| Minimum RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Install size | 6 GB | 50 GB |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Darwin Project · Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Darwin Project and 1 for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Darwin Project and Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands in scope?
Darwin Project has drawn 18,460 Steam reviews and installs in 6 GB. Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands has drawn 113,815 Steam reviews, ships 8 add-ons and installs in 50 GB.
Is Darwin Project or Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands rates higher (7.3 to 7.2). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Darwin Project or Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands?
Darwin Project is cheaper right now at Free, against $49.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.