GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Farthest Frontier vs Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms

Farthest Frontier is a simulation strategy game from Crate Entertainment (2025) while Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms is an action-RPG RPG game from Free Wing (2026).

Quick answer: Farthest Frontier rates higher, 7.7 to 7.4 on the GamingPickz Score, and Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms is the cheaper at $17.99.

Farthest Frontier

2025 · Crate Entertainment

7.7GamingPickz Score

$34.99

Steam: Very Positive

Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms

2026 · Free Wing

7.4GamingPickz Score

$17.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Farthest Frontier is filed under Simulation and Strategy. In contrast, Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms under Action-RPG and RPG.

Farthest Frontier

Protect and guide your people as you forge a town from untamed wilderness at the edge of the known world. Harvest raw materials, hunt, fish and farm to survive. Produce crafted items to trade, consume, equip and fight with as you battle for your survival against the elements and outside threats.

Description from its Steam store page

Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms

This Three Kingdoms sandbox RPG lets you do whatever you wish in the late Han Dynasty. Be a ruler, courtier, or hermit. Make friends, marry, raise children, manage estates, train yourself & allies, govern, drill troops, experience & alter history, and conquer all to win the hearts of the people.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Farthest FrontierHeroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms
GamingPickz Score7.7/107.4/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (86%, 25,411)Very Positive (89%, 8,162)
Critic aggregate83/100No aggregate
Price$34.99$17.99
Install size11 GB10 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20252026
DeveloperCrate EntertainmentFree Wing

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Farthest Frontier vs Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Farthest FrontierSimulation strategy game
    Heroes' Vow: Three KingdomsAction-RPG RPG game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Farthest FrontierEarly Access, Historical, Agriculture
    Heroes' Vow: Three KingdomsEarly Access, Simulation, Strategy

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Farthest Frontier ✓Score 7.7 · 86% on Steam · 83 critic
    Heroes' Vow: Three KingdomsScore 7.4 · 89% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Farthest Frontier25,411 reviews · 1 add-on · 11 GB
    Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms8,162 reviews · 10 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Farthest Frontier$34.99
    Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms ✓$17.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Farthest FrontierPlayable
    Heroes' Vow: Three KingdomsPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Farthest Frontier and Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100Players →Popularity →

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Farthest Frontier (GamingPickz Score 7.7)
  • The cheaper right now: Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms ($17.99)
  • Lighter on storage: Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms (10 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Farthest Frontier (25,411 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Early AccessHistoricalImmersive SimTop-DownStrategyBuildingSimulationWar

Where they differ

Farthest Frontier is also

AgricultureMedieval4XCity BuilderResource ManagementRTS

Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms is also

RPGTurn-Based StrategyAction RPGGrand StrategyStrategy RPGWargame

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Farthest Frontier is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Farthest Frontier and 0 for Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Farthest Frontier and Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms in scope?

Farthest Frontier has drawn 25,411 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 11 GB. Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms has drawn 8,162 Steam reviews and installs in 10 GB.

Is Farthest Frontier or Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Farthest Frontier rates higher (7.7 to 7.4). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Farthest Frontier or Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms?

Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms is cheaper right now at $17.99, against $34.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Should I get Farthest Frontier or Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms?

Farthest Frontier rates higher, 7.7 to 7.4 on the GamingPickz Score, and Heroes' Vow: Three Kingdoms is the cheaper at $17.99. It also depends on what you want: the "which to pick" section above calls out which is cheaper, lighter on storage, better on a Steam Deck and the safer bet by weight of reviews.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

All comparisons

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each