GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Final Fantasy Type-0 vs KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-

Final Fantasy Type-0 is an action-RPG JRPG game from Square Enix (2011) while KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- is an action-adventure action-RPG game from Square Enix (2024).

Final Fantasy Type-0

2011 · Square Enix

5.9GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Mixed

KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-

2024 · Square Enix

7.4GamingPickz Score

$49.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Final Fantasy Type-0 under Action-RPG and JRPG. In contrast, it files KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- under Action-Adventure and Action-RPG.

Final Fantasy Type-0

FINAL FANTASY TYPE-0 HD brings an immersive world, memorable characters and the production value known of the series, together with high quality gameplay and storytelling truly worthy of the FINAL FANTASY name.

Description from its Steam store page

KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-

KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- is an HD remastered collection of 6 unforgettable KINGDOM HEARTS experiences. Take up your Keyblade to save the Disney worlds from darkness.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Final Fantasy Type-0KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-
GamingPickz Score5.9/107.4/10
Steam ratingMixed (63%, 3,184)Very Positive (87%, 12,072)
Critic aggregate69/100No aggregate
Price$29.99$49.99
Install size30 GB60 GB
Steam Deckunsupportedverified
Released20112024
DeveloperSquare EnixSquare Enix

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Final Fantasy Type-0 vs KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Final Fantasy Type-0Action-RPG JRPG game
    KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-Action-adventure action-RPG game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Final Fantasy Type-0RPG, Action, JRPG
    KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-Action, RPG, Adventure

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Final Fantasy Type-0Score 5.9 · 63% on Steam · 69 critic
    KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-Score 7.4 · 87% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Final Fantasy Type-03,184 reviews · 30 GB
    KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-12,072 reviews · 60 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Final Fantasy Type-0$29.99
    KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-$49.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Final Fantasy Type-0Unsupported
    KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-Verified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Final Fantasy Type-0 and KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC
  • PlayStation

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- (GamingPickz Score 7.4)
  • The cheaper right now: Final Fantasy Type-0 ($29.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: Final Fantasy Type-0 (30 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- (12,072 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

RPGActionJRPGFantasyStory RichAction RPGSingleplayerAnime

Where they differ

Final Fantasy Type-0 is also

Third PersonDramaNudityLinearOpen WorldMultiplayer

KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- is also

Action-AdventureEmotionalColorfulAtmosphericCuteCharacter Action Game

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Final Fantasy Type-0 is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 5 accessibility features for Final Fantasy Type-0 and 7 for KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Final Fantasy Type-0 and KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- in scope?

Final Fantasy Type-0 has drawn 3,184 Steam reviews and installs in 30 GB. KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- has drawn 12,072 Steam reviews and installs in 60 GB.

Is Final Fantasy Type-0 or KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- better?

By the GamingPickz Score, KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX- rates higher (7.4 to 5.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Final Fantasy Type-0 or KINGDOM HEARTS -HD 1.5+2.5 ReMIX-?

Final Fantasy Type-0 is cheaper right now at $29.99, against $49.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each