GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Fran Bow vs The Past Within

Fran Bow is a horror puzzle game from Killmonday Games AB (2015) while The Past Within is a horror puzzle game from Rusty Lake (2022).

Fran Bow

2015 · Killmonday Games AB

7.9GamingPickz Score

$14.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

The Past Within

2022 · Rusty Lake

8.0GamingPickz Score

$5.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files Fran Bow under Horror and Puzzle. In contrast, it files The Past Within under Horror and Puzzle.

Fran Bow

Fran Bow is a creepy adventure game that tells the story of Fran, a young girl struggling with a mental disorder and an unfair destiny.

Description from its Steam store page

The Past Within

The Past Within is the new co-op experience from Rusty Lake! Play together with someone you deem trustworthy: one in The Past, the other in The Future. Observe and communicate what you see around you. Solve the puzzles and uncover Albert Vanderboom’s plan.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Fran BowThe Past Within
GamingPickz Score7.9/108.0/10
Steam ratingOverwhelmingly Positive (97%, 22,936)Overwhelmingly Positive (95%, 16,814)
Critic aggregate70/100No aggregate
Price$14.99$5.99
Install size5 GB1 GB
Steam Deckverifiedverified
Released20152022
DeveloperKillmonday Games ABRusty Lake

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Fran Bow vs The Past Within, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Fran BowHorror puzzle game
    The Past WithinHorror puzzle game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Fran BowPsychological Horror, Story Rich, Point & Click
    The Past WithinCo-op, Puzzle, Online Co-Op

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Fran BowScore 7.9 · 97% on Steam · 70 critic
    The Past WithinScore 8.0 · 95% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Fran Bow22,936 reviews · 2 add-ons · 5 GB
    The Past Within16,814 reviews · 1 add-on · 1 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Fran Bow$14.99
    The Past Within$5.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Fran BowVerified
    The Past WithinVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

The Past Within takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Fran Bow and The Past Within on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The cheaper right now: The Past Within ($5.99)
  • Lighter on storage: The Past Within (1 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

Psychological HorrorStory RichPoint & ClickPuzzleHorrorAdventureIndieAtmospheric

Where they differ

Fran Bow is also

DarkSingleplayerFemale ProtagonistGorePsychologicalDark Fantasy

The Past Within is also

Co-opOnline Co-OpMultiplayerEscape RoomMysteryLocal Co-Op

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Fran Bow is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. The Past Within is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Fran BowThe Past Within
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce 9800 / ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Minimum CPU2.4GHz Dual Core
Minimum RAM1 GB
Install size5 GB1 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Fran Bow · The Past Within.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Fran Bow and 0 for The Past Within. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Fran Bow and The Past Within in scope?

Fran Bow has drawn 22,936 Steam reviews, ships 2 add-ons and installs in 5 GB. The Past Within has drawn 16,814 Steam reviews, ships 1 add-on and installs in 1 GB.

Is Fran Bow or The Past Within better?

By the GamingPickz Score, The Past Within rates higher (8.0 to 7.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Fran Bow or The Past Within?

The Past Within is cheaper right now at $5.99, against $14.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each