GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Gold Mining Simulator vs House Flipper

Gold Mining Simulator is an open-world racing game from Code Horizon (2017) while House Flipper is a mmorpg sandbox game from Empyrean (2018).

Gold Mining Simulator

2017 · Code Horizon

6.5GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Mostly Positive

House Flipper

2018 · Empyrean

8.0GamingPickz Score

$24.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Gold Mining Simulator under Open-World and Racing. In contrast, it files House Flipper under Mmorpg and Sandbox.

Gold Mining Simulator

Become a gold miner. Work hard, dig deep, explore the world, and you’ll become the wealthiest person in Alaska. Use a variety of specialist machines to find as much gold as you can.

Description from its Steam store page

House Flipper

House Flipper is a unique chance to become a one-man renovation crew. Buy, repair and remodel devastated houses. Give them a second life and sell them at a profit!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Gold Mining SimulatorHouse Flipper
GamingPickz Score6.5/108.0/10
Steam ratingMostly Positive (73%, 16,382)Very Positive (94%, 111,507)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate67/100
Price$19.99$24.99
Install size19 GB6 GB
Steam Deckplayableverified
Released20172018
DeveloperCode HorizonEmpyrean

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Gold Mining Simulator vs House Flipper, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Gold Mining SimulatorOpen-world racing game
    House FlipperMmorpg sandbox game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Gold Mining SimulatorSimulation, Mining, Realistic
    House FlipperSimulation, Design & Illustration, Building

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Gold Mining SimulatorScore 6.5 · 73% on Steam
    House FlipperScore 8.0 · 94% on Steam · 67 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Gold Mining Simulator16,382 reviews · 5 add-ons · 19 GB
    House Flipper111,507 reviews · 10 add-ons · 6 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Gold Mining Simulator$19.99
    House Flipper$24.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Gold Mining SimulatorPlayable
    House FlipperVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

House Flipper takes 2 of the marked rounds to 1. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Gold Mining Simulator and House Flipper on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: House Flipper (GamingPickz Score 8.0)
  • The cheaper right now: Gold Mining Simulator ($19.99)
  • Better on a Steam Deck: House Flipper (verified)
  • Lighter on storage: House Flipper (6 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: House Flipper (111,507 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SimulationSingleplayerRealisticIndieSandboxEconomyBuildingFirst-Person

Where they differ

Gold Mining Simulator is also

MiningOpen WorldDrivingExplorationStrategyAutomobile Sim

House Flipper is also

Design & IllustrationCasualEducationImmersive SimMultiplayerFamily Friendly

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Gold Mining Simulator is demanding, for players who want a challenge. House Flipper is relaxed, easy to pick up.

System requirements, side by side

Gold Mining SimulatorHouse Flipper
Minimum GPUNVidia GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 560 / AMD R7-260X
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5Intel Core i3 3,20GHz / AMD Phenom II X4 955 3,2 GHz
Minimum RAM8 GB4 GB
Install size19 GB6 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Gold Mining Simulator · House Flipper.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 7 accessibility features for Gold Mining Simulator and 1 for House Flipper. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Gold Mining Simulator and House Flipper in scope?

Gold Mining Simulator has drawn 16,382 Steam reviews, ships 5 add-ons and installs in 19 GB. House Flipper has drawn 111,507 Steam reviews, ships 10 add-ons and installs in 6 GB.

Is Gold Mining Simulator or House Flipper better?

By the GamingPickz Score, House Flipper rates higher (8.0 to 6.5). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Gold Mining Simulator or House Flipper?

Gold Mining Simulator is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $24.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each