GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Hearts of Iron IV vs Victoria II

Hearts of Iron IV is an open-world sandbox game from Paradox Development Studio (2016) while Victoria II is a sandbox simulation game from Development Studio (2010).

Hearts of Iron IV

2016 · Paradox Development Studio

8.4GamingPickz Score

$49.99

Steam: Very Positive

Victoria II

2010 · Development Studio

7.7GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Hearts of Iron IV under Open-World and Sandbox. In contrast, it files Victoria II under Sandbox and Simulation.

Hearts of Iron IV

Victory is at your fingertips! Your ability to lead your nation is your supreme weapon, the strategy game Hearts of Iron IV lets you take command of any nation in World War II; the most engaging conflict in world history.

Description from its Steam store page

Victoria II

Carefully guide your nation from the era of absolute monarchies in the early 19th century, through expansion and colonization, to finally become a truly great power by the dawn of the 20th century. Victoria II is a grand strategy game played during the colonial era of the 19th century, where the player takes control of a country, guiding...

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

Hearts of Iron IVVictoria II
GamingPickz Score8.4/107.7/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (90%, 375,658)Very Positive (92%, 20,016)
Critic aggregate83/10075/100
Price$49.99$19.99
Install size2 GB
Steam Deckplayableplayable
Released20162010
DeveloperParadox Development StudioDevelopment Studio

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Hearts of Iron IV vs Victoria II, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    Hearts of Iron IVOpen-world sandbox game
    Victoria IISandbox simulation game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    Hearts of Iron IVStrategy, World War II, Grand Strategy
    Victoria IIGrand Strategy, Strategy, Historical

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    Hearts of Iron IVScore 8.4 · 90% on Steam · 83 critic
    Victoria IIScore 7.7 · 92% on Steam · 75 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Hearts of Iron IV375,658 reviews · 24 add-ons · 2 GB
    Victoria II20,016 reviews · 10 add-ons

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Hearts of Iron IV$49.99
    Victoria II$19.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    Hearts of Iron IVPlayable
    Victoria IIPlayable

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Hearts of Iron IV and Victoria II on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Hearts of Iron IV (GamingPickz Score 8.4)
  • The cheaper right now: Victoria II ($19.99)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Hearts of Iron IV (375,658 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

StrategyGrand StrategyWarHistoricalMilitaryAlternate HistoryMultiplayerSimulation

Where they differ

Hearts of Iron IV is also

World War IITacticalCo-opStrategy RPGOpen WorldCompetitive

Victoria II is also

Political SimPoliticsEconomyWorld War IManagementModdable

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Hearts of Iron IV is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Victoria II is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

Hearts of Iron IVVictoria II
Minimum GPUNvidia® GeForce™ GTX 470 (1.28GB)
Minimum CPUIntel® Core™ i5 750Intel® Pentium® IV 2.4 GHz
Minimum RAM4 GB2 GB
Install size2 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Hearts of Iron IV · Victoria II.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 0 accessibility features for Hearts of Iron IV and 0 for Victoria II. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Hearts of Iron IV and Victoria II in scope?

Hearts of Iron IV has drawn 375,658 Steam reviews, ships 24 add-ons and installs in 2 GB. Victoria II has drawn 20,016 Steam reviews and ships 10 add-ons.

Is Hearts of Iron IV or Victoria II better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Hearts of Iron IV rates higher (8.4 to 7.7). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Hearts of Iron IV or Victoria II?

Victoria II is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $49.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each