Little Nightmares vs Mark of the Ninja
Little Nightmares is a horror platformer game from Tarsier Studios (2017) while Mark of the Ninja is a platformer puzzle game from Klei Entertainment.
What each one is
Steam files Little Nightmares under Horror and Platformer. In contrast, it files Mark of the Ninja under Platformer and Puzzle.
Take on the role of Six, a lone child lost in a massive metal vessel known as the Maw, surrounded by dangerous, distorted versions of adults. You’ll need to do your best to escape in one piece or your fate will be worse than you ever dared dream.
In Mark of the Ninja, you'll know what it is to truly be a ninja. You must be silent, agile and clever to outwit your opponents in a world of gorgeous scenery and flowing animation. Marked with cursed tattoos giving you heightened senses, every situation presents you with options.
At a glance
| Little Nightmares | Mark of the Ninja | |
|---|---|---|
| GamingPickz Score | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Steam rating | Overwhelmingly Positive (95%, 116,529) | Overwhelmingly Positive (97%, 15,877) |
| Critic aggregate | 81/100 | 91/100 |
| Price | $19.99 | Not listed |
| Install size | 10 GB | — |
| Steam Deck | verified | verified |
| Released | 2017 | — |
| Developer | Tarsier Studios | Klei Entertainment |
Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.
Little Nightmares vs Mark of the Ninja, point by point
Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.
Genre and premise
Little NightmaresHorror platformer gameMark of the NinjaPlatformer puzzle gameWhat each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.
How it plays
Little NightmaresHorror, Atmospheric, AdventureMark of the NinjaStealth, Platformer, NinjaThe tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.
Reception
Little NightmaresScore 8.3 · 95% on Steam · 81 criticMark of the NinjaScore 8.3 · 97% on Steam · 91 criticThe GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.
Content and scale
Little Nightmares116,529 reviews · 9 add-ons · 10 GBMark of the Ninja15,877 reviewsReach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.
Price
Little Nightmares$19.99Mark of the NinjaNot listedRead live from Steam and subject to change.
On a Steam Deck
Little NightmaresVerifiedMark of the NinjaVerifiedValve's own Deck compatibility rating.
Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 0 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.
The two on the grid
Compare the whole catalogueLittle Nightmares and Mark of the Ninja on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.
2 games have both
Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.
Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.
- PC
Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.
How positions are decided
No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
- Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
- Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
- No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
- A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
- Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.
Which to pick, by what you want
- The safer bet by weight of reviews: Little Nightmares (116,529 reviews)
What they have in common
Both are tagged by Steam players with:
AtmosphericAdventureSingleplayerDarkPuzzleIndieStory RichStealth
Where they differ
HorrorPuzzle-PlatformerPsychological HorrorGreat Soundtrack2.5DThird Person
Ninja2DSide ScrollerAssassinControllerReplay Value
Tags players apply to one game and not the other.
Difficulty and who each is for
By the tags players apply, Little Nightmares is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Mark of the Ninja is relaxed, easy to pick up.
System requirements, side by side
| Little Nightmares | Mark of the Ninja | |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum GPU | Nvidia GTX 460 | NVIDIA® GeForce® 7800 GT |
| Minimum CPU | Intel CPU Core i3 | AMD Phenom 9750 |
| Minimum RAM | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Install size | 10 GB | — |
Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Little Nightmares · Mark of the Ninja.
Accessibility features
Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Little Nightmares and 1 for Mark of the Ninja. A declaration is a floor, not a review.
If you like one, also try
Common questions
How different are Little Nightmares and Mark of the Ninja in scope?
Little Nightmares has drawn 116,529 Steam reviews, ships 9 add-ons and installs in 10 GB. Mark of the Ninja has drawn 15,877 Steam reviews.
Is Little Nightmares or Mark of the Ninja better?
By the GamingPickz Score, Little Nightmares rates higher (8.3 to 8.3). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.
Which is cheaper, Little Nightmares or Mark of the Ninja?
One or both do not have a current listed price, so a straight comparison is not possible. See the table above.
Do you rank one above the other for a fee?
No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.
Related comparisons
How we compare, and what we will not do
The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.