GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

MudRunner vs SnowRunner

MudRunner is an open-world racing game from Saber Interactive (2017) while SnowRunner is an open-world racing game from Saber Interactive (2021).

MudRunner

2017 · Saber Interactive

8.0GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

SnowRunner

2021 · Saber Interactive

7.9GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files MudRunner under Open-World and Racing. In contrast, it files SnowRunner under Open-World and Racing.

MudRunner

MudRunner is the ultimate off-road experience putting the players in the driver seat and dares them to take charge of incredible all-terrain vehicles, venturing across extreme Siberian landscapes with only a map and compass as guides!

Description from its Steam store page

SnowRunner

Get ready for the next-generation off-road experience! Drive powerful vehicles and overcome extreme open environments to complete dozens of challenging missions solo or with up to 3 friends!

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

MudRunnerSnowRunner
GamingPickz Score8.0/107.9/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (92%, 44,003)Very Positive (90%, 55,755)
Critic aggregateNo aggregateNo aggregate
Price$19.99$29.99
Install size1 GB50 GB
Steam Deckverifiedverified
Released20172021
DeveloperSaber InteractiveSaber Interactive

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

MudRunner vs SnowRunner, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    MudRunnerOpen-world racing game
    SnowRunnerOpen-world racing game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    MudRunnerOffroad, Simulation, Automobile Sim
    SnowRunnerSimulation, Automobile Sim, Adventure

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    MudRunnerScore 8.0 · 92% on Steam
    SnowRunnerScore 7.9 · 90% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    MudRunner44,003 reviews · 4 add-ons · 1 GB
    SnowRunner55,755 reviews · 48 add-ons · 50 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    MudRunner$19.99
    SnowRunner$29.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    MudRunnerVerified
    SnowRunnerVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

MudRunner takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

MudRunner and SnowRunner on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The cheaper right now: MudRunner ($19.99)
  • Lighter on storage: MudRunner (1 GB)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SimulationAutomobile SimMultiplayerDrivingRealisticOpen WorldPhysicsSandbox

Where they differ

MudRunner is also

OffroadCo-opOnline Co-OpModModdableSingleplayer

SnowRunner is also

Immersive SimSnowNatureATVTeam-BasedPvE

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, MudRunner is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. SnowRunner is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

MudRunnerSnowRunner
Minimum GPUNVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Minimum CPUIntel® Pentium Dual Core 2.0GHz
Minimum RAM2 GB
Install size1 GB50 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: MudRunner · SnowRunner.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for MudRunner and 7 for SnowRunner. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are MudRunner and SnowRunner in scope?

MudRunner has drawn 44,003 Steam reviews, ships 4 add-ons and installs in 1 GB. SnowRunner has drawn 55,755 Steam reviews, ships 48 add-ons and installs in 50 GB.

Is MudRunner or SnowRunner better?

By the GamingPickz Score, MudRunner rates higher (8.0 to 7.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, MudRunner or SnowRunner?

MudRunner is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $29.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each