GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

Ōkami vs Tales of Symphonia

Ōkami is an action-adventure action-RPG game from Clover Studio (2006) while Tales of Symphonia is an action-RPG JRPG game from Namco Tales Studio (2003).

Ōkami

2006 · Clover Studio

8.0GamingPickz Score

$9.99

Steam: Very Positive

Tales of Symphonia

2003 · Namco Tales Studio

6.9GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

What each one is

Steam files Ōkami under Action-Adventure and Action-RPG. In contrast, it files Tales of Symphonia under Action-RPG and JRPG.

Ōkami

Experience the critically acclaimed masterpiece with its renowned Sumi-e ink art style in breathtaking high resolution.

Description from its Steam store page

Tales of Symphonia

FIRST TIME ON STEAM – Based on the PlayStation®3 port of the original GameCube game, this RPG classic is finally available for PC.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

ŌkamiTales of Symphonia
GamingPickz Score8.0/106.9/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (92%, 10,705)Very Positive (85%, 5,196)
Critic aggregate92/100No aggregate
Price$9.99$19.99
Install size34 GB7 GB
Steam Deckverifiedverified
Released20062003
DeveloperClover StudioNamco Tales Studio

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

Ōkami vs Tales of Symphonia, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    ŌkamiAction-adventure action-RPG game
    Tales of SymphoniaAction-RPG JRPG game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    ŌkamiAdventure, Mythology, Story Rich
    Tales of SymphoniaJRPG, RPG, Anime

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    ŌkamiScore 8.0 · 92% on Steam · 92 critic
    Tales of SymphoniaScore 6.9 · 85% on Steam

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    Ōkami10,705 reviews · 5 add-ons · 34 GB
    Tales of Symphonia5,196 reviews · 7 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    Ōkami$9.99
    Tales of Symphonia$19.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    ŌkamiVerified
    Tales of SymphoniaVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Ōkami takes 2 of the marked rounds to 0. That is only what a number can decide, not which you will enjoy more.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

Ōkami and Tales of Symphonia on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularityTales of Symphonia

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • Multi-platform
  • Nintendo

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Ōkami (GamingPickz Score 8.0)
  • The cheaper right now: Ōkami ($9.99)
  • Lighter on storage: Tales of Symphonia (7 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Ōkami (10,705 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

AdventureGreat SoundtrackStory RichSingleplayerClassicAtmosphericActionOpen World

Where they differ

Ōkami is also

MythologyFemale ProtagonistCult ClassicStylizedColorfulAction-Adventure

Tales of Symphonia is also

Local Co-OpReplay ValueCo-opLocal MultiplayerEpicCute

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, Ōkami is middle-of-the-road on difficulty. Tales of Symphonia is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

ŌkamiTales of Symphonia
Minimum GPUNvidia GeForce 8800GT / ATI Radeon HD 4830
Minimum CPUIntel Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz / AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+, 2.6GHz
Minimum RAM1 GB
Install size34 GB7 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: Ōkami · Tales of Symphonia.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for Ōkami and 1 for Tales of Symphonia. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are Ōkami and Tales of Symphonia in scope?

Ōkami has drawn 10,705 Steam reviews, ships 5 add-ons and installs in 34 GB. Tales of Symphonia has drawn 5,196 Steam reviews and installs in 7 GB.

Is Ōkami or Tales of Symphonia better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Ōkami rates higher (8.0 to 6.9). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, Ōkami or Tales of Symphonia?

Ōkami is cheaper right now at $9.99, against $19.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each