GamingPickz
Game vs game · side by side

PC Building Simulator vs Teardown

PC Building Simulator is a puzzle sandbox game from Claudiu Kiss (2019) while Teardown is an open-world puzzle game from Tuxedo Labs (2022).

PC Building Simulator

2019 · Claudiu Kiss

8.1GamingPickz Score

$19.99

Steam: Very Positive

Teardown

2022 · Tuxedo Labs

8.4GamingPickz Score

$29.99

Steam: Overwhelmingly Positive

What each one is

Steam files PC Building Simulator under Puzzle and Sandbox. In contrast, it files Teardown under Open-World and Puzzle.

PC Building Simulator

Build and grow your very own computer repair enterprise as you learn to diagnose, fix and build PCs. With real-world licensed components and comprehensive hardware and software simulation, you can plan and bring your ultimate PC to life.

Description from its Steam store page

Teardown

Prepare the perfect heist in a fully destructible, simulated voxel world. Tear down walls with vehicles or use explosives to create your own shortcuts. Shape the environment to your advantage in the most creative ways you can imagine. Play solo or with up to 12 players in multiplayer.

Description from its Steam store page

At a glance

PC Building SimulatorTeardown
GamingPickz Score8.1/108.4/10
Steam ratingVery Positive (93%, 52,742)Overwhelmingly Positive (96%, 135,539)
Critic aggregateNo aggregate80/100
Price$19.99$29.99
Install size30 GB12 GB
Steam Deckverifiedverified
Released20192022
DeveloperClaudiu KissTuxedo Labs

Prices and Steam ratings are read live and move over time.

PC Building Simulator vs Teardown, point by point

Each facet side by side. A round is marked won only where a figure settles it; feel and "which is better" carry no mark, because no number we hold decides them.

  1. Genre and premise

    PC Building SimulatorPuzzle sandbox game
    TeardownOpen-world puzzle game

    What each is filed as. Each game describes itself in full above; we do not judge a premise.

  2. How it plays

    PC Building SimulatorSimulation, Education, Immersive Sim
    TeardownDestruction, Physics, Sandbox

    The tags players apply most, in order of votes. A read on feel, not a verdict.

  3. Reception

    PC Building SimulatorScore 8.1 · 93% on Steam
    TeardownScore 8.4 · 96% on Steam · 80 critic

    The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment, critics and popularity, computed the same way for every game.

  4. Content and scale

    PC Building Simulator52,742 reviews · 11 add-ons · 30 GB
    Teardown135,539 reviews · 4 add-ons · 12 GB

    Reach and footprint, not quality: more reviews or a bigger install is not a better game.

  5. Price

    PC Building Simulator$19.99
    Teardown$29.99

    Read live from Steam and subject to change.

  6. On a Steam Deck

    PC Building SimulatorVerified
    TeardownVerified

    Valve's own Deck compatibility rating.

Across the rounds a number can settle, it is level at 1 each. Which one is "better" is the part no figure decides, so we leave it to what you want from the two.

The two on the grid

Compare the whole catalogue

PC Building Simulator and Teardown on the axes the GamingPickz Score is built from, on the full 0 to 100 scale so each dot is its real position. Change either axis to compare them on any measure.

2 games have both

01000100PlayersPopularity

Players. The share of Steam reviews marked positive, pulled toward the catalogue average in proportion to how few reviews stand behind it. A game with 200 reviews moves a long way toward the average; one with 200,000 barely moves at all. Without this a title sitting at 100 percent on nine reviews outranks Half-Life 2 at 98 percent on 278,000.

Popularity. A blend of two things that are not the same. Audience is how many people wrote a Steam review, which is a floor on how many played it. Reach is how many language editions of Wikipedia document the game, which is cultural footprint rather than sales. A game can score high on one and low on the other: a huge free-to-play title has audience without reach, and a landmark console exclusive has reach without a Steam audience at all. Where both exist they are averaged; where only one does, that one carries it.

  • PC

Every point links to that game's entry. The value map and the reception map are fixed views of the same data.

See the whole grid

How positions are decided

No paid placement, no favouritism, live third-party data
  • Placed by the published method, not by us. Every coordinate is computed from the axis definitions and weights printed on this site. Nobody moves a point. See the axes.
  • Nothing here is paid for. No sponsored placements, no promoted slots, no arrangement of any kind affects a position. If that ever changes it will be labelled and sit outside the ranking.
  • No favouritism, including our own. The 16 games we have written full reviews of are scored by exactly the same formula as the other 1,510, from the same third-party inputs, and they land where it puts them. Our own opinion of a game does not enter its coordinates.
  • A position is not an endorsement. It says how a game was received and what it costs, not that we recommend it. Where we do recommend something, it carries a written review with a name on it.
  • Fetched from live third-party data. Player sentiment from Steam, critic aggregates as published on store pages, prices checked hourly, attention from Wikipedia. Each figure carries its source and the date it was read, and we do not adjust any of them.

Which to pick, by what you want

  • The higher-rated of the two: Teardown (GamingPickz Score 8.4)
  • The cheaper right now: PC Building Simulator ($19.99)
  • Lighter on storage: Teardown (12 GB)
  • The safer bet by weight of reviews: Teardown (135,539 reviews)

What they have in common

Both are tagged by Steam players with:

SimulationImmersive SimSandboxFirst-Person3DRealisticSingleplayerPuzzle

Where they differ

PC Building Simulator is also

EducationBuildingManagementLife SimCasualRelaxing

Teardown is also

DestructionPhysicsVoxelOpen WorldHeistAction

Tags players apply to one game and not the other.

Difficulty and who each is for

By the tags players apply, PC Building Simulator is relaxed, easy to pick up. Teardown is middle-of-the-road on difficulty.

System requirements, side by side

PC Building SimulatorTeardown
Minimum GPUGeForce GTX 660 (2048 MB)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
Minimum CPUIntel Core i5-2500KQuad Core CPU
Minimum RAM4 GB8 GB
Install size30 GB12 GB

Can your PC run them? Check each against your own kit: PC Building Simulator · Teardown.

Accessibility features

Steam store pages declare 1 accessibility feature for PC Building Simulator and 1 for Teardown. A declaration is a floor, not a review.

If you like one, also try

Common questions

How different are PC Building Simulator and Teardown in scope?

PC Building Simulator has drawn 52,742 Steam reviews, ships 11 add-ons and installs in 30 GB. Teardown has drawn 135,539 Steam reviews, ships 4 add-ons and installs in 12 GB.

Is PC Building Simulator or Teardown better?

By the GamingPickz Score, Teardown rates higher (8.4 to 8.1). That is a composite of player sentiment, the critic aggregate and popularity, not our taste. "Better" also depends on price, length and platform, which the table above lays out.

Which is cheaper, PC Building Simulator or Teardown?

PC Building Simulator is cheaper right now at $19.99, against $29.99. Prices move, so this is read live from Steam and can change.

Do you rank one above the other for a fee?

No. Neither game, nor anyone else, pays for placement or a verdict here. The order and every figure come out of the same public data the rest of the site uses.

How we compare, and what we will not do

The GamingPickz Score is a composite of player sentiment (adjusted for sample size), the critic aggregate and popularity, computed by the same code every ranked list on this site uses. The Steam rating label is Valve's own, reconstructed from the positive percentage and review count. Prices are read live. We do not write an opinion of which game is "better": we report the numbers and say which wins each measurable question above.

More on each